Publication

ការបោះពុម្ភផ្សាយ

Ensuring an adequate relocation site for railway communities

An overview of the situation 

In early August 2022, 320 families in Phnom Penh’s Kilometer 6 commune (known hereon as the railway community) accepted a land compensation package, administered by local authorities, through a lucky draw. This land dispute was caused by a development project: to build a 12-meter-wide concrete road, as well as a drainage system, by the old train tracks. The new road will run from Tuol Kork district to Russey Keo via Daun Penh causing the eviction of the railway community. Following a number of advocacy efforts and negotiations, the Russey Keo district’s administration set up a lucky draw, to allocate each affected family with a plot of land, in a nearby area along the O Veng Canal of Boeung Salang, also in the Russey Keo district.  

Each family received a plot of land of 4 meters x 15 meters without any monetary compensation. This resolution came after a decade of community and activist-led advocacy, as members of the railway community relentlessly defended their right to land and adequate housing. The community is primarily concerned that the infrastructure for their new homes will not be built any time soon, as many parts of the site have only just been filled with soil to make way for house construction.    

Current housing situation of railway residents
Current housing situation of railway residents

Site visit and discussion with community leader and members  

Following the acceptance of the plots of land, STT went to visit the relocation sites to investigate the situation. Some parts of the site had already been demarcated for the railway community residents. However, none of the families have moved to the new location site yet​​​ due to its unreadiness. It was also noted that there are no clean water or electricity outlets in place. The road in front of the allocated plots of land has not been developed either, it is currently covered in gravel.  

Plots of lands were divided and given to the railway residents

One of the community leaders told STT that even though families accepted the compensation, they made a public request at a press conference, calling the City authorities to provide extra financial and material support. Families need money for transporting construction materials, construction costs, clean water and electricity connections, land titling, and so on. The next step will be to ask for land title registration. The community leader has stressed that this is of utmost urgency, and he is currently seeking support from the City and local authorities.  

On the 9th of August 2022, a few other community members expressed relief that the government authorities provided them with some compensation. However, they are still concerned over the lack of financial help for rebuilding their homes on the plots of land along the canal. Community members expressed the same apprehension as the community leader, with regards to access to water, electricity, and land titling. One concern for STT is that these communities will approach Micro-Finance Institutions to ask for loans to build their new homes. Many NGOs including STT have documented predatory practices undertaken by MFIs in Cambodia. If loans are taken out to build houses, the poor will face further challenges. 

An excavator clearing land for relocation sites
An excavator clearing land for relocation sites

Key legal instruments to ensure the quality of relocation 

The right to adequate housing is guaranteed by a list of national laws and regulations, as well as international human rights instruments. Firstly, Article 25 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights provides that everyone is entitled to the right to housing. This is elucidated further in the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, which states, under Article 11, that governments must take “appropriate steps” to ensure the realization of this right. However, the relationship between eviction, resettlement and human rights is not clearly delineated here. 

The Constitution of Cambodia (1993) recognizes the importance of human rights, notably those stipulated in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, through Article 31. With regards to eviction and resettlement, Article 44 of the Constitution outlines the right to land, stressing that land ownership in Cambodia is a right reserved to all Khmer citizens. 

The “Circular on Resolution on Temporary Settlements on Land Which Has Been Illegally Occupied in The Capital, Municipal and Urban Areas,” more commonly known as “Circular 03,” is a government policy aimed to help address urban land disputes. Circular 03, signed off in 2010, is a dispute resolution mechanism for communities said to be occupying public space, private state land, or private company-owned land, in confrontation with authorities. 

The Government of Cambodia also set up the “National Housing Policy” in 2014. This is a further step towards the realisation of the right to housing for Cambodian citizens, especially the urban poor. This policy acknowledges that the right to housing is a human right, by outlining requirements for house construction, upgrading, and financing. The housing policy emphasises the need for good housing governance in conjunction with proper land-use planning. 

Finally, the “Human Rights Commentary and Guidelines on Eviction and Resettlement” published by the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights to Cambodia (OHCHR,) outlines the rights of individuals which need to be respected during eviction and relocation processes. Although it carries no legal weight, and it is unclear if authorities are aware of its existence, it is an important tool to help outline key principles that must be upheldto respect human rights norms and standards during eviction processes. Most importantly, the guideline stipulates that “All resettlement measures, such as the construction of homes, the provision of water, electricity, sanitation, schools, access to roads, and the allocation of land, shall adhere to internationally recognized human rights principles.” 

Conclusion 

The Phnom Penh Kilometer 6 commune’s right to adequate housing should be respected and protected under domestic and international laws. Plots of land provided by the City authorities are not enough. The community’s need for material and construction costs, basic infrastructure such as roads, connection to electricity and clean water, should be provided by the authorities. As it stands, the government and the authorities are not fulfilling their legal obligations to provide adequate compensation for the affected communities. Furthermore, the relocated families need to be given land titles once all other basic needs are covered. 

 An overview of the situation 

In early August 2022, 320 families in Phnom Penh’s Kilometer 6 commune (known hereon as the railway community) accepted a land compensation package, administered by local authorities, through a lucky draw. This land dispute was caused by a development project: to build a 12-meter-wide concrete road, as well as a drainage system, by the old train tracks. The new road will run from Tuol Kork district to Russey Keo via Daun Penh causing the eviction of the railway community. Following a number of advocacy efforts and negotiations, the Russey Keo district’s administration set up a lucky draw, to allocate each affected family with a plot of land, in a nearby area along the O Veng Canal of Boeung Salang, also in the Russey Keo district.  

Each family received a plot of land of 4 meters x 15 meters without any monetary compensation. This resolution came after a decade of community and activist-led advocacy, as members of the railway community relentlessly defended their right to land and adequate housing. The community is primarily concerned that the infrastructure for their new homes will not be built any time soon, as many parts of the site have only just been filled with soil to make way for house construction.    

Current housing situation of railway residents
Current housing situation of railway residents

Site visit and discussion with community leader and members  

Following the acceptance of the plots of land, STT went to visit the relocation sites to investigate the situation. Some parts of the site had already been demarcated for the railway community residents. However, none of the families have moved to the new location site yet​​​ due to its unreadiness. It was also noted that there are no clean water or electricity outlets in place. The road in front of the allocated plots of land has not been developed either, it is currently covered in gravel.  

Plots of lands were divided and given to the railway residents

One of the community leaders told STT that even though families accepted the compensation, they made a public request at a press conference, calling the City authorities to provide extra financial and material support. Families need money for transporting construction materials, construction costs, clean water and electricity connections, land titling, and so on. The next step will be to ask for land title registration. The community leader has stressed that this is of utmost urgency, and he is currently seeking support from the City and local authorities.  

On the 9th of August 2022, a few other community members expressed relief that the government authorities provided them with some compensation. However, they are still concerned over the lack of financial help for rebuilding their homes on the plots of land along the canal. Community members expressed the same apprehension as the community leader, with regards to access to water, electricity, and land titling. One concern for STT is that these communities will approach Micro-Finance Institutions to ask for loans to build their new homes. Many NGOs including STT have documented predatory practices undertaken by MFIs in Cambodia. If loans are taken out to build houses, the poor will face further challenges. 

An excavator clearing land for relocation sites
An excavator clearing land for relocation sites

Key legal instruments to ensure the quality of relocation 

The right to adequate housing is guaranteed by a list of national laws and regulations, as well as international human rights instruments. Firstly, Article 25 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights provides that everyone is entitled to the right to housing. This is elucidated further in the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, which states, under Article 11, that governments must take “appropriate steps” to ensure the realization of this right. However, the relationship between eviction, resettlement and human rights is not clearly delineated here. 

The Constitution of Cambodia (1993) recognizes the importance of human rights, notably those stipulated in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, through Article 31. With regards to eviction and resettlement, Article 44 of the Constitution outlines the right to land, stressing that land ownership in Cambodia is a right reserved to all Khmer citizens. 

The “Circular on Resolution on Temporary Settlements on Land Which Has Been Illegally Occupied in The Capital, Municipal and Urban Areas,” more commonly known as “Circular 03,” is a government policy aimed to help address urban land disputes. Circular 03, signed off in 2010, is a dispute resolution mechanism for communities said to be occupying public space, private state land, or private company-owned land, in confrontation with authorities. 

The Government of Cambodia also set up the “National Housing Policy” in 2014. This is a further step towards the realisation of the right to housing for Cambodian citizens, especially the urban poor. This policy acknowledges that the right to housing is a human right, by outlining requirements for house construction, upgrading, and financing. The housing policy emphasises the need for good housing governance in conjunction with proper land-use planning. 

Finally, the “Human Rights Commentary and Guidelines on Eviction and Resettlement” published by the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights to Cambodia (OHCHR,) outlines the rights of individuals which need to be respected during eviction and relocation processes. Although it carries no legal weight, and it is unclear if authorities are aware of its existence, it is an important tool to help outline key principles that must be upheldto respect human rights norms and standards during eviction processes. Most importantly, the guideline stipulates that “All resettlement measures, such as the construction of homes, the provision of water, electricity, sanitation, schools, access to roads, and the allocation of land, shall adhere to internationally recognized human rights principles.” 

Conclusion 

The Phnom Penh Kilometer 6 commune’s right to adequate housing should be respected and protected under domestic and international laws. Plots of land provided by the City authorities are not enough. The community’s need for material and construction costs, basic infrastructure such as roads, connection to electricity and clean water, should be provided by the authorities. As it stands, the government and the authorities are not fulfilling their legal obligations to provide adequate compensation for the affected communities. Furthermore, the relocated families need to be given land titles once all other basic needs are covered. 

 

(Khmer) សេចក្តីថ្លែងការណ៍រួម ស្តីពី ការធ្វើវិសោធនកម្មរដ្ឋធម្មនុញ្ញលើកទី១០

Sorry, this entry is only available in Khmer. For the sake of viewer convenience, the content is shown below in the alternative language. You may click the link to switch the active language.

រាជធានីភ្នំពេញ, ថ្ងៃពុធ ១៤ រោច ខែអាសាឍ ឆ្នាំខាល ចត្វាស័ក ពុទ្ធសករាជ ២៥៦៦ ត្រូវនឹងថ្ងៃទី២៧ ខែកក្កដា ឆ្នាំ២០២២

យើង​ខ្ញុំ​ជាអង្គការ​មិនមែនរដ្ឋាភិបាល សហភាព សហព័ន្ធសហជីព សមាគម និងសហគមន៍ ដូច​មាន​រាយនាម​ខាងក្រោម​ សូមសម្តែងការ​ព្រួយបារម្ភ​យ៉ាង​ខ្លាំង អំពីការធ្វើវិសោធនកម្មរដ្ឋធម្មនុញ្ញលើកទី១០ បានស្នើដោយរាជរដ្ឋាភិ​បាល។ អង្គការ​មិនមែនរដ្ឋាភិបាល សហភាព សហព័ន្ធសហជីព សមាគម និងសហគមន៍ យល់ឃើញថា ការធ្វើវិសោធ​ន​ក​ម្មនៅក្នុង​កាលៈ​ទេសៈនេះ វាអាច​​បណ្តាលឱ្យមានការប៉ះពាល់ដល់ស្ថិរភាពអំណាចរដ្ឋ និងអំណាចនីតិប្រតិបត្តិ ការគោរពសិទ្ធិសេរីភាពពលរដ្ឋខ្មែរ ដែលបានចារិកក្នុងរដ្ឋធម្មនុញ្ញ ដោយសារតែ ៖

– ការមិនឆ្លុះបញ្ចាំងពីឆន្ទៈរបស់ប្រជាពលរដ្ឋខ្មែរ ​ដូចមានចារិកក្នុងបុព្វកថា ដោយហេតុថា មិនមានការផ្សព្វផ្សាយ និងកំណត់នៅក្នុងគោលនយោបាយរបស់គណបក្សនយោបាយពេលឃោសនាបោះឆ្នោតកន្លងមក ដែលនាំឱ្យពលរដ្ឋខ្មែរ មិនទាន់បានយល់ដឹងអំពីគំនិតផ្តួចផ្តើមនៃវិសោធនកម្មនេះ ដោយទូលំទូលាយនៅឡើយ។

– ប៉ះពាល់ដល់ប្រព័ន្ធប្រជាធិបតេយ្យសេរីពហុបក្សក្នុងប្រព័ន្ធសភានិយម (ដែលហាមដោយមាត្រា ១៥៥ថ្មី) ដោយ សេចក្តីព្រាងនេះ នៅតែមានការបោះឆ្នោតជាកញ្ចប់ ព្រមទាំងបានបង្កើនចំនួនសមាជិកសភាក្នុងការធ្វើញត្តិស្តីបន្ទោសដល់រដ្ឋាភិបាល (បន្ថយឱកាសធ្វើញ្ញត្តិបន្ទោស) និងការចាត់តាំងវរៈជនជានាយករដ្ឋមន្រ្តី ដោយមិនមានការឯកភាពពីប្រធាន និងអនុប្រធានរដ្ឋសភា ដែលប្រការនេះ ធ្វើឱ្យថយចុះនូវអំណាចរបស់រដ្ឋសភា។

– ប៉ះពាល់ដល់ស្មារតីឯកភាព និងសាមគ្គីភាពជាតិ ដោយសារតែកាលៈទេសៈនេះ មានការប្រេះឆាខាងផ្នែកនយោបាយនៅឡើយ (មាត្រា៩២ ដែលហាមរដ្ឋសភាមុនឱ្យអនុម័តច្បាប់ដែលប៉ះពាល់ដល់ឯកភាពនយោបាយរបស់ប្រទេសជាតិ)។

– និង ប្រព័ន្ធសភានិយមនៃប្រជាធិបតេយ្យតំណាង តាមរយៈរដ្ឋសភា កាលណាអំណាចរដ្ឋសភាថយចុះ នឹងប៉ះពាល់ដល់ជំនឿទុកចិត្តលើប្រព័ន្ធច្បាប់ ការអភិវឌ្ឍន៍សេដ្ឋកិច្ច ហើយអ្នករងគ្រោះ គឺប្រជាពលរដ្ឋ និងប្រទេសជាតិទាំងមូល។

យើង​ខ្ញុំ​ជាអង្គការ​មិនមែនរដ្ឋាភិបាល​ សហភាព សហព័ន្ធសហជីព សមាគម និងសហគមន៍ យល់ឃើញថា ទោះបីជាស្ថាប័នយើងខ្ញុំ មិនមានអាណត្តិជាតំណាងឆន្ទៈរាស្ត្រ ដូចគណបក្សនយោបាយក៏ដោយ ក៏ស្ថាប័នយើងខ្ញុំ មានគោលបំណងចង់ឃើញប្រទេសកម្ពុជារបស់ខ្លួន មានរដ្ឋធម្មនុញ្ញរឹងមាំ ឆ្លុះបញ្ចាំងឆន្ទៈប្រជាពលរដ្ឋខ្មែរ ដូចចារិកក្នុងបុព្វកថានៃរដ្ឋធម្មនុញ្ញ និងឃើញការឯកភាពជាតិខាងនយោបាយ រវាងគណបក្សនយោបាយ និងអ្នកនយោ​បាយ​​ទាំងអស់ និងស្នើសុំរដ្ឋសភាពិចារណា ក្នុងការផ្អាកនូវការអនុម័តលើ   សេចក្តីព្រាងវិសោធនកម្មរដ្ឋធម្មនុញ្ញ​នេះ រហូតដល់គណបក្សនយោបាយ បានដាក់ខ្លឹមសារពង្រាងបទបញ្ញត្តិនៃមាត្រាដែលស្នើសុំវិសោធនកម្មនេះ ចូលក្នុងកម្មវិធីនយោបាយរបស់គណបក្ស​ខ្លួន ហើយឃោសនាពន្យល់ដល់ប្រជាពលរដ្ឋ និងផ្តល់ឱកាសឱ្យ​ពលរដ្ឋសម្តែងនូវឆន្ទៈរបស់ខ្លួន តាមរយៈ​ការបោះឆ្នោត​សិន។

 

អង្គការមិនមែនរដ្ឋាភិបាលសហភាព សហព័ន្ធសហជីព សមាគម និងសហគមន៍​ដែល​គាំទ្រ​សេចក្តីថ្លែង​ការណ៍នេះ ៖

១. មជ្ឈមណ្ឌលប្រជាពលរដ្ឋដើម្បីអភិវឌ្ឍន៍ និងសន្តិភាព (ភីឌីភី)
២. សមាគមការពារសិទ្ធិមនុស្ស និងអភិវឌ្ឍន៍នៅកម្ពុជា (អាដហុក)
៣. មជ្ឈមណ្ឌលសម្ព័ន្ធភាពការងារ និងសិទ្ធិមនុស្ស (សង់ត្រាល់)
៤. គណៈកម្មាធិការដើម្បីការបោះឆ្នោតដោយសេរី និងយុត្តិធម៌នៅកម្ពុជា (ខុមហ្វ្រែល)
៥. គណៈកម្មាធិការអព្យាក្រឹត និងយុត្តិធម៌ ដើម្បីការបោះឆ្នោត ដោយសេរី និងត្រឹមត្រូវនៅកម្ពុជា (និចហ្វិក)
៦. អង្គការកម្មវិធីអភិវឌ្ឍន៍ធនធានយុវជន
៧. អង្គការតម្លាភាពកម្ពុជា
៨. អង្គការសម្ព័ន្ធភាពការពារសិទ្ធិមនុស្សកម្ពុជា
៩. អង្គការមជ្ឈមណ្ឌលអប់រំច្បាប់សម្រាប់សហគមន៍
១០. អង្គការសង្រ្គោះជនទុរគត និងមនុស្សចាស់
១១. អង្គការ​ស​ម​ធម៍​កម្ពុជា
១២. អង្គការអភិវឌ្ឍន៍ស្រ្តីក្នុងទីក្រុង
១៣. អង្គការសិទ្ធិមនុស្សដើម្បីតម្លាភាព និងសន្តិភាព
១៤. វិទ្យាស្ថានប្រជាធិបតេយ្យកម្ពុជា
១៥. អង្គការសម្ព័ន្ធដើម្បីសុចរិតភាព និងគណនេយ្យភាពសង្គម
១៦. អង្គការស្ពានសន្តិភាព
១៧. អង្គការក្រុមការងារដើម្បីដោះស្រាយទំនាស់
១៨. អង្គការសមាគមធាងត្នោត
១៩. អង្គការសម្ព័ន្ធគណនេយ្យភាពសង្គមកម្ពុជា (ស.គ.ក)
២០. អង្គការយេនឌ័រ និងអភិវឌ្ឍន៍ដើម្បីកម្ពុជា
២១. អង្គការក្រុមប្រឹក្សាយុវជនកម្ពុជា
២២. អង្គការអភិវឌ្ឍន៍សំលេងសហគមន៍
២៣. អង្គការវិទ្យាស្ថានតស៊ូមតិ និងគោលនយោបាយ
២៤. មជ្ឃមណ្ឌលកម្ពុជាដើម្បីប្រព័ន្ធផ្សព្វផ្សាយឯករាជ្យ
២៥. សមាគមប្រជាធិបតេយ្យឯករាជ្យនៃសេដ្ឋកិច្ចក្រៅប្រព័ន្ធ
២៦. សមាគមសម្ព័ន្ធសហគមន៍កសិករកម្ពុជា
២៧. សមាគមបណ្តាញយុវជនកម្ពុជា
២៨. សមាគមមន្ត្រីរាជការឯករាជ្យកម្ពុជា
២៩. សមាគមអ្នកបើកបររថយន្តធុនធ្ងន់
៣០. សមាគមពង្រឹងសេដ្ឋកិច្ចក្រៅប្រព័ន្ធកម្ពុជា
៣១. សមាគមខ្មែរកម្ពុជាក្រោម ដើម្បីសិទ្ធិមនុស្ស និងអភិវឌ្ឍន៍
៣២. សមាគមកម្មករកម្ពុជាសេដ្ឋកិច្ចក្រៅប្រព័ន្ធ
៣៣. បណ្តាញពហុវិស័យ
៣៤. សម្ព័ន្ធសហជីពប្រជាធិបតេយ្យកម្មករកាត់ដេរកម្ពុជា
៣៥. សហភាពសហជីពកម្ពុជា
៣៦. សហព័ន្ធសហជីព កម្មករចំណីអាហារនិង សេវាកម្ម កម្ពុជា
៣៧. សហភាពការងារកម្ពុជា
៣៨. សហពន្ធ័សហជីព កម្ពុជាឯករាជ្យ
៣៩. សហព័ន្ធសហជីពឯករាជ្យ
៤០. សហព័ន្ធសហជីពសេរីឯករាជ្យ
៤១. សហព័ន្ធសហជីពកម្មករនិយោជិកវិស័យទេសចរណ៍កម្ពុជា
៤២. សម្ព័ន្ធសហជីពសេរីស្រ្តីកាត់ដេរ
៤៣. សហព័ន្ធសហជីពកម្មករសំណង់ និងព្រៃឈើកម្ពុជា
៤៤. សហភាពផ្ទះសាមគ្គី
៤៥. សហជីពទ្រទ្រង់សិទ្ធិការងារបុគ្គលិកកម្មករខ្មែរនៃក្រុមហ៊ុនកាស៊ីណូ ណាហ្គាវើលដ៍​​​​​​​
៤៦. សហព័ន្ធសហជីពកម្ពុជា
៤៧. សហគមន៍ព្រៃឈើព្រៃពាយ
៤៨. សហគមន៍ព្រៃឈើពូទុងពូហុង
៤៩. សហគមន៍ កៅពីរ (៩២)
៥០. សហគមន៍ឧត្តមស្រែពស់
៥១. សហគមន៍ព្រៃឈើឃ្មុំស្រករថ្លុកឫស្សី
៥២. សហគមន៍សាមគ្គីត្រពាំងទន្ទឹម
៥៣. សហគមន៍ភ្នំព្រះលាន
៥៤. សហគមន៍តស៊ូ
៥៥. សហគមន៍ជនជាតិដើមភាគតិចកួយប្រើសក្អក
៥៦. សហគមន៍បុស្ស
៥៧. សហគមន៍រុនតាឯក
៥៨. សហគមន៍សិលាខ្មែរ
៥៩. សហគមន៍ព្រៃពាយ
៦០. សហគមន៍ភ្នំត្នោត
៦១. សហគមន៍ព្រែកត្នោត
៦២. សហគមន៍ស្ពានត្នោត
៦៣. សហគមន៍ត្បែងលិច
៦៤. សហគមន៍ចាន់ស
៦៥. សហគមន៍ទួលគ្រួស
៦៦. សហគមន៍គោកកឋិន
៦៧. សហគមន៍ផ្គាំ
៦៨. សហគមន៍បន្ទាយឆ្មារ
៦៩. សហគមន៍ស្វាយលើ
៧០. សហគមន៍តាបៀម
៧១. សហគមន៍តាផូ
៧២. សហគមន៍ទឹកជោ
២៣. សហគមន៍ថ្មគោល
៧៤. សហគមន៍តានី
៧៥. សហគមន៍ក្បាលទន្សោង
៧៦. សហគមន៍ក្តិបថ្ម
៧៧. សហគមន៍បឹងមាលា
៧៨. សហគមន៍ព្រៃរកា
៧៩. សហគមន៍សំរោង
៨០. សហគមន៍ខ្នារសណ្តាយ
៨១. សហគមន៍ចំបក់ពោះ
៨២. សហគមន៍ពោធិ
៨៣. សហគមន៍សាមគ្គីសង្កែពីរ
៨៤. សហគមន៍បឹងទន្លេម្រេច
៨៥. សហគមន៍ទឹកក្រហម
៨៦. សហគមន៍ថ្នល់បត់
៨៧. សហគមន៍តំបូកខ្ពស់
៨៨. សហគមន៍ត្រពាំងប្រិយ៍
៨៩. សហគមន៍ផ្អាវ
៩០. សហគមន៍ត្រពាំងតាវ
៩១. សហគមន៍គោកមន
៩២. សហគមន៍អន្លង់វែង
៩៣. សហគមន៍បាក់អន្លូង
៩៤. សហគមន៍ថ្លាត
៩៥. សហគមន៍គោកខ្ពស់
៩៦. សហគមន៍បេង
៩៧. សហគមន៍បន្សាយរាក់
៩៨. សហគមន៍ព្រះប្រឡាយ
៩៩. សហគមន៍លំទង
១០០. សហគមន៍ពង្រ
១០១. សហគមន៍ទំនប់ដាច់
១០២. សហគមន៍សំរោង
១០៣. សហគមន៍នេសាទព្រែកលួង
១០៤. សហគមន៍នេសាទព្រែកនរិន្ទ

រាជធានីភ្នំពេញ, ថ្ងៃពុធ ១៤ រោច ខែអាសាឍ ឆ្នាំខាល ចត្វាស័ក ពុទ្ធសករាជ ២៥៦៦ ត្រូវនឹងថ្ងៃទី២៧ ខែកក្កដា ឆ្នាំ២០២២

យើង​ខ្ញុំ​ជាអង្គការ​មិនមែនរដ្ឋាភិបាល សហភាព សហព័ន្ធសហជីព សមាគម និងសហគមន៍ ដូច​មាន​រាយនាម​ខាងក្រោម​ សូមសម្តែងការ​ព្រួយបារម្ភ​យ៉ាង​ខ្លាំង អំពីការធ្វើវិសោធនកម្មរដ្ឋធម្មនុញ្ញលើកទី១០ បានស្នើដោយរាជរដ្ឋាភិ​បាល។ អង្គការ​មិនមែនរដ្ឋាភិបាល សហភាព សហព័ន្ធសហជីព សមាគម និងសហគមន៍ យល់ឃើញថា ការធ្វើវិសោធ​ន​ក​ម្មនៅក្នុង​កាលៈ​ទេសៈនេះ វាអាច​​បណ្តាលឱ្យមានការប៉ះពាល់ដល់ស្ថិរភាពអំណាចរដ្ឋ និងអំណាចនីតិប្រតិបត្តិ ការគោរពសិទ្ធិសេរីភាពពលរដ្ឋខ្មែរ ដែលបានចារិកក្នុងរដ្ឋធម្មនុញ្ញ ដោយសារតែ ៖

– ការមិនឆ្លុះបញ្ចាំងពីឆន្ទៈរបស់ប្រជាពលរដ្ឋខ្មែរ ​ដូចមានចារិកក្នុងបុព្វកថា ដោយហេតុថា មិនមានការផ្សព្វផ្សាយ និងកំណត់នៅក្នុងគោលនយោបាយរបស់គណបក្សនយោបាយពេលឃោសនាបោះឆ្នោតកន្លងមក ដែលនាំឱ្យពលរដ្ឋខ្មែរ មិនទាន់បានយល់ដឹងអំពីគំនិតផ្តួចផ្តើមនៃវិសោធនកម្មនេះ ដោយទូលំទូលាយនៅឡើយ។

– ប៉ះពាល់ដល់ប្រព័ន្ធប្រជាធិបតេយ្យសេរីពហុបក្សក្នុងប្រព័ន្ធសភានិយម (ដែលហាមដោយមាត្រា ១៥៥ថ្មី) ដោយ សេចក្តីព្រាងនេះ នៅតែមានការបោះឆ្នោតជាកញ្ចប់ ព្រមទាំងបានបង្កើនចំនួនសមាជិកសភាក្នុងការធ្វើញត្តិស្តីបន្ទោសដល់រដ្ឋាភិបាល (បន្ថយឱកាសធ្វើញ្ញត្តិបន្ទោស) និងការចាត់តាំងវរៈជនជានាយករដ្ឋមន្រ្តី ដោយមិនមានការឯកភាពពីប្រធាន និងអនុប្រធានរដ្ឋសភា ដែលប្រការនេះ ធ្វើឱ្យថយចុះនូវអំណាចរបស់រដ្ឋសភា។

– ប៉ះពាល់ដល់ស្មារតីឯកភាព និងសាមគ្គីភាពជាតិ ដោយសារតែកាលៈទេសៈនេះ មានការប្រេះឆាខាងផ្នែកនយោបាយនៅឡើយ (មាត្រា៩២ ដែលហាមរដ្ឋសភាមុនឱ្យអនុម័តច្បាប់ដែលប៉ះពាល់ដល់ឯកភាពនយោបាយរបស់ប្រទេសជាតិ)។

– និង ប្រព័ន្ធសភានិយមនៃប្រជាធិបតេយ្យតំណាង តាមរយៈរដ្ឋសភា កាលណាអំណាចរដ្ឋសភាថយចុះ នឹងប៉ះពាល់ដល់ជំនឿទុកចិត្តលើប្រព័ន្ធច្បាប់ ការអភិវឌ្ឍន៍សេដ្ឋកិច្ច ហើយអ្នករងគ្រោះ គឺប្រជាពលរដ្ឋ និងប្រទេសជាតិទាំងមូល។

យើង​ខ្ញុំ​ជាអង្គការ​មិនមែនរដ្ឋាភិបាល​ សហភាព សហព័ន្ធសហជីព សមាគម និងសហគមន៍ យល់ឃើញថា ទោះបីជាស្ថាប័នយើងខ្ញុំ មិនមានអាណត្តិជាតំណាងឆន្ទៈរាស្ត្រ ដូចគណបក្សនយោបាយក៏ដោយ ក៏ស្ថាប័នយើងខ្ញុំ មានគោលបំណងចង់ឃើញប្រទេសកម្ពុជារបស់ខ្លួន មានរដ្ឋធម្មនុញ្ញរឹងមាំ ឆ្លុះបញ្ចាំងឆន្ទៈប្រជាពលរដ្ឋខ្មែរ ដូចចារិកក្នុងបុព្វកថានៃរដ្ឋធម្មនុញ្ញ និងឃើញការឯកភាពជាតិខាងនយោបាយ រវាងគណបក្សនយោបាយ និងអ្នកនយោ​បាយ​​ទាំងអស់ និងស្នើសុំរដ្ឋសភាពិចារណា ក្នុងការផ្អាកនូវការអនុម័តលើ   សេចក្តីព្រាងវិសោធនកម្មរដ្ឋធម្មនុញ្ញ​នេះ រហូតដល់គណបក្សនយោបាយ បានដាក់ខ្លឹមសារពង្រាងបទបញ្ញត្តិនៃមាត្រាដែលស្នើសុំវិសោធនកម្មនេះ ចូលក្នុងកម្មវិធីនយោបាយរបស់គណបក្ស​ខ្លួន ហើយឃោសនាពន្យល់ដល់ប្រជាពលរដ្ឋ និងផ្តល់ឱកាសឱ្យ​ពលរដ្ឋសម្តែងនូវឆន្ទៈរបស់ខ្លួន តាមរយៈ​ការបោះឆ្នោត​សិន។

 

អង្គការមិនមែនរដ្ឋាភិបាលសហភាព សហព័ន្ធសហជីព សមាគម និងសហគមន៍​ដែល​គាំទ្រ​សេចក្តីថ្លែង​ការណ៍នេះ ៖

១. មជ្ឈមណ្ឌលប្រជាពលរដ្ឋដើម្បីអភិវឌ្ឍន៍ និងសន្តិភាព (ភីឌីភី)
២. សមាគមការពារសិទ្ធិមនុស្ស និងអភិវឌ្ឍន៍នៅកម្ពុជា (អាដហុក)
៣. មជ្ឈមណ្ឌលសម្ព័ន្ធភាពការងារ និងសិទ្ធិមនុស្ស (សង់ត្រាល់)
៤. គណៈកម្មាធិការដើម្បីការបោះឆ្នោតដោយសេរី និងយុត្តិធម៌នៅកម្ពុជា (ខុមហ្វ្រែល)
៥. គណៈកម្មាធិការអព្យាក្រឹត និងយុត្តិធម៌ ដើម្បីការបោះឆ្នោត ដោយសេរី និងត្រឹមត្រូវនៅកម្ពុជា (និចហ្វិក)
៦. អង្គការកម្មវិធីអភិវឌ្ឍន៍ធនធានយុវជន
៧. អង្គការតម្លាភាពកម្ពុជា
៨. អង្គការសម្ព័ន្ធភាពការពារសិទ្ធិមនុស្សកម្ពុជា
៩. អង្គការមជ្ឈមណ្ឌលអប់រំច្បាប់សម្រាប់សហគមន៍
១០. អង្គការសង្រ្គោះជនទុរគត និងមនុស្សចាស់
១១. អង្គការ​ស​ម​ធម៍​កម្ពុជា
១២. អង្គការអភិវឌ្ឍន៍ស្រ្តីក្នុងទីក្រុង
១៣. អង្គការសិទ្ធិមនុស្សដើម្បីតម្លាភាព និងសន្តិភាព
១៤. វិទ្យាស្ថានប្រជាធិបតេយ្យកម្ពុជា
១៥. អង្គការសម្ព័ន្ធដើម្បីសុចរិតភាព និងគណនេយ្យភាពសង្គម
១៦. អង្គការស្ពានសន្តិភាព
១៧. អង្គការក្រុមការងារដើម្បីដោះស្រាយទំនាស់
១៨. អង្គការសមាគមធាងត្នោត
១៩. អង្គការសម្ព័ន្ធគណនេយ្យភាពសង្គមកម្ពុជា (ស.គ.ក)
២០. អង្គការយេនឌ័រ និងអភិវឌ្ឍន៍ដើម្បីកម្ពុជា
២១. អង្គការក្រុមប្រឹក្សាយុវជនកម្ពុជា
២២. អង្គការអភិវឌ្ឍន៍សំលេងសហគមន៍
២៣. អង្គការវិទ្យាស្ថានតស៊ូមតិ និងគោលនយោបាយ
២៤. មជ្ឃមណ្ឌលកម្ពុជាដើម្បីប្រព័ន្ធផ្សព្វផ្សាយឯករាជ្យ
២៥. សមាគមប្រជាធិបតេយ្យឯករាជ្យនៃសេដ្ឋកិច្ចក្រៅប្រព័ន្ធ
២៦. សមាគមសម្ព័ន្ធសហគមន៍កសិករកម្ពុជា
២៧. សមាគមបណ្តាញយុវជនកម្ពុជា
២៨. សមាគមមន្ត្រីរាជការឯករាជ្យកម្ពុជា
២៩. សមាគមអ្នកបើកបររថយន្តធុនធ្ងន់
៣០. សមាគមពង្រឹងសេដ្ឋកិច្ចក្រៅប្រព័ន្ធកម្ពុជា
៣១. សមាគមខ្មែរកម្ពុជាក្រោម ដើម្បីសិទ្ធិមនុស្ស និងអភិវឌ្ឍន៍
៣២. សមាគមកម្មករកម្ពុជាសេដ្ឋកិច្ចក្រៅប្រព័ន្ធ
៣៣. បណ្តាញពហុវិស័យ
៣៤. សម្ព័ន្ធសហជីពប្រជាធិបតេយ្យកម្មករកាត់ដេរកម្ពុជា
៣៥. សហភាពសហជីពកម្ពុជា
៣៦. សហព័ន្ធសហជីព កម្មករចំណីអាហារនិង សេវាកម្ម កម្ពុជា
៣៧. សហភាពការងារកម្ពុជា
៣៨. សហពន្ធ័សហជីព កម្ពុជាឯករាជ្យ
៣៩. សហព័ន្ធសហជីពឯករាជ្យ
៤០. សហព័ន្ធសហជីពសេរីឯករាជ្យ
៤១. សហព័ន្ធសហជីពកម្មករនិយោជិកវិស័យទេសចរណ៍កម្ពុជា
៤២. សម្ព័ន្ធសហជីពសេរីស្រ្តីកាត់ដេរ
៤៣. សហព័ន្ធសហជីពកម្មករសំណង់ និងព្រៃឈើកម្ពុជា
៤៤. សហភាពផ្ទះសាមគ្គី
៤៥. សហជីពទ្រទ្រង់សិទ្ធិការងារបុគ្គលិកកម្មករខ្មែរនៃក្រុមហ៊ុនកាស៊ីណូ ណាហ្គាវើលដ៍​​​​​​​
៤៦. សហព័ន្ធសហជីពកម្ពុជា
៤៧. សហគមន៍ព្រៃឈើព្រៃពាយ
៤៨. សហគមន៍ព្រៃឈើពូទុងពូហុង
៤៩. សហគមន៍ កៅពីរ (៩២)
៥០. សហគមន៍ឧត្តមស្រែពស់
៥១. សហគមន៍ព្រៃឈើឃ្មុំស្រករថ្លុកឫស្សី
៥២. សហគមន៍សាមគ្គីត្រពាំងទន្ទឹម
៥៣. សហគមន៍ភ្នំព្រះលាន
៥៤. សហគមន៍តស៊ូ
៥៥. សហគមន៍ជនជាតិដើមភាគតិចកួយប្រើសក្អក
៥៦. សហគមន៍បុស្ស
៥៧. សហគមន៍រុនតាឯក
៥៨. សហគមន៍សិលាខ្មែរ
៥៩. សហគមន៍ព្រៃពាយ
៦០. សហគមន៍ភ្នំត្នោត
៦១. សហគមន៍ព្រែកត្នោត
៦២. សហគមន៍ស្ពានត្នោត
៦៣. សហគមន៍ត្បែងលិច
៦៤. សហគមន៍ចាន់ស
៦៥. សហគមន៍ទួលគ្រួស
៦៦. សហគមន៍គោកកឋិន
៦៧. សហគមន៍ផ្គាំ
៦៨. សហគមន៍បន្ទាយឆ្មារ
៦៩. សហគមន៍ស្វាយលើ
៧០. សហគមន៍តាបៀម
៧១. សហគមន៍តាផូ
៧២. សហគមន៍ទឹកជោ
២៣. សហគមន៍ថ្មគោល
៧៤. សហគមន៍តានី
៧៥. សហគមន៍ក្បាលទន្សោង
៧៦. សហគមន៍ក្តិបថ្ម
៧៧. សហគមន៍បឹងមាលា
៧៨. សហគមន៍ព្រៃរកា
៧៩. សហគមន៍សំរោង
៨០. សហគមន៍ខ្នារសណ្តាយ
៨១. សហគមន៍ចំបក់ពោះ
៨២. សហគមន៍ពោធិ
៨៣. សហគមន៍សាមគ្គីសង្កែពីរ
៨៤. សហគមន៍បឹងទន្លេម្រេច
៨៥. សហគមន៍ទឹកក្រហម
៨៦. សហគមន៍ថ្នល់បត់
៨៧. សហគមន៍តំបូកខ្ពស់
៨៨. សហគមន៍ត្រពាំងប្រិយ៍
៨៩. សហគមន៍ផ្អាវ
៩០. សហគមន៍ត្រពាំងតាវ
៩១. សហគមន៍គោកមន
៩២. សហគមន៍អន្លង់វែង
៩៣. សហគមន៍បាក់អន្លូង
៩៤. សហគមន៍ថ្លាត
៩៥. សហគមន៍គោកខ្ពស់
៩៦. សហគមន៍បេង
៩៧. សហគមន៍បន្សាយរាក់
៩៨. សហគមន៍ព្រះប្រឡាយ
៩៩. សហគមន៍លំទង
១០០. សហគមន៍ពង្រ
១០១. សហគមន៍ទំនប់ដាច់
១០២. សហគមន៍សំរោង
១០៣. សហគមន៍នេសាទព្រែកលួង
១០៤. សហគមន៍នេសាទព្រែកនរិន្ទ

Story of Change Steung Kambot Community

Background

Steung Kambot is an urban poor community located in Lor Kam Bour village, Svay Pak commune, Russey Keo district, Phnom Penh. There are 210 households, 244 families, and 847 community members (437 females). They have lived there since 1979 and continue to live there to this day.

Problem/ Challenge

Because some of the community’s houses were located along Street 1003, Russey Keo authorities did not provide land titles, nor did they recognize their land tenure. Furthermore, authorities referred to the community as a community living on public state roads. Despite having lived there since 1979, the community never obtained any official documentation to act as proof for their settlement and land titling. The community members lack confidence to advocate for their livelihoods and land tenure. From 2020 to 2021, the community suffered from the widening of the 30-meter road, and they still live under fear of imminent eviction, which could potentially have them relocate far from their original settlement.

Intervention by STT

Sahmakum Teang Tnaut (STT) went to observe and discuss the community’s challenges. After hearing their problems, STT implemented a project with the community. The project included training on the Land Law, Circular 03/06, Human Rights Principles, Advocacy and ICT skills. Now the community understands such issues better and have developed more confidence and courage. People in the community have become united and advocate very seriously about their land issues to find a solution.

More recently, the community members organized a public march to an event at the building of the Ministry of Land Management, and Urban Planning and Construction, where the Prime Minister presided. The community members just wanted to raise two points: on-site development, and land titling. The Khan authorities said that the campaign was illegal since the community residents had not submitted requests to relevant local authorities.

Result/ Outcome/ Change

As a result of STT’s intervention, the community members now have the capacity to lead community and advocacy activities more independently, with confidence. From September 2020 until now, the community has submitted five petitions to four ministries and one letter to the Prime Minister’s cabinet seeking intervention in their land settlement. In addition, on 29 October 2021, they submitted their letter to the Ministry of Justice and the relevant Anti-Corruption Unit to request intervention on their land issue. Mr. Makara received an invitation from the Russey Keo district administration to discuss the community’s land situation.

However, Mr. Sar Makara refused to attend the meeting with Mr. Prach Seiha, Deputy Governor of Russey Keo District, because Mr. Sar Makara stated that this meeting could take place only with the participation of at least 10 to 12 members of the community’s committee.

Community representatives went to the Ministry of Justice and Anti-Corruption Unit for following up the petition

 

In October 2021, Community members (244 families) of Steung Kambot community conducted a campaign to request the government to look at their land issue. The community blocked the street to force the authority to consider their land problem. One of the community leaders, Mrs Long Poch said “SuSu (keeping fighting for land rights)! I will die on the land”.

Authorities of Russey Keo district finally conducted a meeting with the community on the 11 November, 2021 to discuss with the community on the issues and to find solutions. More than 200 Community members of Steung Kambot community met with Mr. Ek Khun Doeun, the governor of Khan Russey Keo, to discuss and find a solution for their land issue.

Another community representative, Mrs. Reoung Oun said that “We, the community members have been living here for 30 years without a land title, but the Borey (gated-community) company has only been developing for 3 to 5 years, and getting the land title, this is very unfair for the communities.

The community members will continue to advocate by conducting advocacy events at both local and national levels, including the follow-up of submitted petitions to relevant government’s ministries and institutions.

Story of Change Russey Sros Community

Background

Russey Sros Community is located in a residential area at Group 7 and 8, Russey Sros Village, Sangkat Niroth, Khan Chbar Ampov, in Phnom Penh. It was originally settled in 1979. There are 465 people living in the area, consisting of 100 families, occupying 100 houses. All residents are ethnically Khmer, and include eight individuals who are disabled. In 2010, the community met to re-select a new representative under supervision by Urban Poor Women Development (UPWD), World Vision Cambodia, Sahmakum Teang Tnaut (STT) and local authorities. At a June meeting in 2015, the Sangkat recognized that the Russey Sros community lives on private land that they themselves own. However, the community has not undergone the Systematic Land Registration process, without which no family can obtain a formal land title.

Despite the fact that they live on private land, residents may still face pressure to relocate. During an informal discussion with the Municipality of Phnom Penh (MPP), residents were made aware that the MPP plans to build a bridge from Koh Pich across the River, through their community. However, families have yet to receive any official notifications regarding these plans.

 

Problems/ Challenges

The community has lived under continuous fear of eviction, ever since they first heard of the MPP’s plan to build a bridge across the river which would force them to relocate. The community has access to electricity provided by the state and buys water from the Phnom Penh Water Supply Authority. There is no communal street lighting, nor are there any drainage systems. Some residents have a private toilet, while others use a “flight toilet” – wherein they relieve themselves in a plastic bag and then throw the bag away. There is no rubbish collection. Flooding has also been an issue throughout the three preceding rainy seasons, sometimes lasting more than four weeks.

The community comprises a number of challenges. These include water and air pollution, domestic violence, rampant drug and alcohol abuse; not to mention infrastructure challenges such as the lack of a proper drainage system, hygienic toilets, and the dilapidated state of homes in the area. Families living there are also concerned about the threat of eviction, and flooding problems.

Community members walked through flooding in the community during rainy season
Community members walked through flooding in the community during rainy season

 

Intervention by STT

Sahmakum Teang Tnaut (STT) has monitored the situation and collected information in the area since 2012. STT has also attempted to map the community, but this has yet to happen. The community empowerment project invited community representatives to attend community exchange visits both in Phnom Penh and in the province. These visits enabled them to witness real urban situations and provided great opportunities for communities to share knowledge. The communities notably demanded land tenure security through the implementation of systematic land registration. Additionally, community representatives and members were

invited to participate in the quarterly meetings that were conducted four times per year. It was a great opportunity for urban communities to meet each other, and to share challenges, experiences, and knowledge. This helped mobilize networks of communities to support each other through social activities with the aim of protecting their land and housing rights from the government and private companies. Exchange Learning visits helped increase capacity for community representatives to be able to exercise leadership within their community. Moreover, community members or representatives were able to gain from the project’s training. Training topics included the land law, secular 03, human rights, non-violence strategies, the basics of ICT, social media (Facebook, WhatsApp, Telegram, Signal, Citizen Journalism, Digital Security, Photo and Video making, and so on). The purpose of these trainings was to strengthen community capacity to protect their land and housing rights, and to be able to claim land title and security.

STT’s projects always teach how to produce community plans, monthly meetings, and ways to engage with local authorities for Sangkat Development action plans. Projects also teach advocacy and ICT skills, and how to monitor and reflect, once the activities are underway. Participants were also encouraged by the project to participate in a national forum on housing policy that was held by the Ministry of Land Management Urban Planning and Construction.

 

Result/ Outcome/ Change

After the projects, the Russey Sros community has become stronger and has developed good relationships with other urban land communities as well as local authorities. They now have the capacity to lead community and advocacy activities more independently, and with confidence. After the community’s struggles which lasted about 18 years, community residents are now waiting for the official land title from Khan Chbar Ampov, as the measuring process of each household is underway. The community members hope that they will get the land title in early 2022.

Since the community representatives and members have joined the trainings, quarterly meetings, workshops, forums, exchange learning visits, NGO advocacy, and Facebook live shows, they have learned about human rights, about land and housing rights, how to protect themselves from forced eviction, and what the main legal documents are, for demanding land and housing rights.

Community representatives and members have understood their rights and now have the capacity to conduct any activity both within the community and outside the community in order to discuss issues and to seek solutions from local authorities. Moreover, they have been submitting petitions to relevant government institutions which enables them to demand interventions on their land dispute. Furthermore, community members joined other communities and civil societies to participate in international events that promote human rights such as World Habitat Day, and International Human Rights Day. In addition, community members always conduct monthly meetings among themselves if they have urgent tasks to be discussed or need to mobilize support from NGOs like STT.

Community monthly meeting conducted by community representative, funded by STT
Community monthly meeting conducted by community representative, funded by STT

Throughout their monthly meetings, the community members have gained strength and empowerment by promoting discussion and sharing knowledge, experiences, and new approaches for claiming land titles for many years.

In October 2021, the authorities set up a committee for measuring the GPS of each household. They were informed that all households submitted their documents to relevant authorities to provide land titles where they are located.

Local authorities were measuring the plots of each community member to make a land title in 2021
Local authorities were measuring the plots of each community member to make a land title in 2021

The community leader of the community Mrs. Sek Saly, 53 years old, living with her husband and one daughter, told STT: “I am so happy to work for my community members and I want to help lift them out of poverty, I put my heart and soul into helping them to get Equity Cards and am waiting to see the result of land titles in the near future”.

Saly added: “Thanks to STT for supporting our community and training us to engage with local authorities in difficult times to achieve the recent changes in the community. STT helped me and other community members to know human rights, land rights, housing rights, communicating with community networks, NGO partners, and how to advocate for a proper solution. I suggest that STT provide more training to them to be able to share in the community.”

Cycling Event Around Boeung Tamok Lake to Join World Environment Day 2022

On May 19, 2022, a group of more than 30 young people who love the environment participated in a cycling event around Boeung Tamok lake, coordinated by the organizing team of the World Environment Day 2022 with 15 associations and organizations. The event has three main objectives:

First, to raise awareness of the general situation, benefits, and challenges of Boeung Tamok lake;
Second, to promote the youth rights in environmental protection and Third, disseminate information to stakeholders, especially those who have the right to decide, and to consider stopping the cutting and contribute to the degradation of Boeung Tamok lake.
The event started from a community located on the east side of Boeung Tamok lake, then continued along the Win-win boulevard, and then into the central part of the lake before continuing on to the west and the north.

In this event, there have also been some problems, such as the blockading of the road by the Prek Pnov district authority at the central part of the lake, which did not allow the youth to see the view of the lake and the deep pit that was dug to fill the lake. In addition, our youth group also had to cycle across the water because of flooding.

Despite some obstacles, our young people expressed their appreciation for the dedication and for their energy and time in this event.
Please note that Boeung Tamok, also known as Boeung Kobsrov is the largest natural lake in Phnom Penh, located in the northwest of the city along Win-Win Boulevard and has a total area of 3239. 7 hectares, covering two districts. 6 villages and 25 villages. Around the lake, there are about 300 families and about 1,000 people living there, most of whom are involved in fishing, raising fish, planting lotus, farming, and small businesses at home. The lake was determined by the sub-decree in 2016 and by the end of 2021, the lake area has been cut and handed over to private individuals and public institutions at least 46 times, covering a total area of 2,094 hectares or 65% of the lake area.

Joint Statement Wanchalearm Satsaksit Remains Missing as UN Body Begins Review of Enforced Disappearances in Cambodia

April 4, 2022 – We, the undersigned organisations, remain deeply concerned about Cambodia’s failure to conduct a thorough, independent, transparent, and effective investigation into the suspected enforced disappearance of Thai activist Wanchalearm Satsaksit and the resulting impunity. As the UN Committee on Enforced Disappearances (CED) prepares for a preliminary review of the situation of enforced disappearances in Cambodia on 5 April 2022, we call on the CED to address Cambodia’s persistent failure to conduct a prompt and thorough search for Wanchalearm to determine his fate and whereabouts or to effectively and transparently investigate his disappearance.

We stand in solidarity with Wanchalearm and his family and all victims of enforced disappearance, and call on Cambodia to address apparent failures of the investigating to date, and to immediately disclose any information they may have about his fate and whereabouts, and to ensure truth, justice and reparations for his family”. We agree with the CED that “the very nature of enforced disappearance [is] a continuous crime” which presents grave risks to the rights to life, liberty, security of person, freedom from secret detention and torture, as well as the right to family life. Families of those disappeared have faced incalculable suffering, while being deprived of the right to obtain redress and have closure.

The CED has previously expressed concern over Cambodian authorities’ failure to define and conduct thorough, impartial, and independent searches and investigations into reported enforced disappearances, a pattern that continued with Wanchalearm’s case. In June 2020, Wanchalearm was abducted in broad daylight outside his apartment building while living in exile in Phnom Penh. Wanchalearm is an outspoken critic of the Thai government and the subject of criminal charges in Thailand. His abduction was captured on CCTV footage, which includes images of the vehicle used and its license plate, as well as by eyewitnesses. Wanchalearm’s sister, Sitanan Satsaksit, also overheard part of the abduction as she was on the phone with him at the time. General Chhay Kim Khouen, spokesman of the National Police, and Khieu Sopheak, spokesman for the Ministry of Interior, initially dismissed the abduction as “fake news” while another official implied that the government would not investigate the matter because there was no formal complaint.

Authorities later denied Wanchalearm had been in Cambodia at the time despite clear evidence and instead focused on issues irrelevant to determining his fate and whereabouts such as whether he had proper immigration documentation. Amid widespread international condemnation, and only after Sitanan Satsaksit filed a formal complaint with the Phnom Penh Municipal Court on 8 July 2020, Cambodian authorities finally opened a criminal investigation in September 2020. Despite Sitanan giving testimony and evidence to a Phnom Penh court in December 2020 and early 2021, there have been no leads in the investigation. Subsequent appeals for information on his disappearance and the progress of the investigation from Wanchalearm’s family have been met with silence. In Thailand, Thai authorities have twice threatened Sitanan with criminal charges after she spoke at events in September and December 2021 about her brother’s disappearance and the need to enact Thailand’s draft law on the prevention and suppression of torture and enforced disappearances.

Wanchalearm’s disappearance is a chilling reminder of the 2007 cross-border disappearances of two Vietnamese pro-democracy and labour activists from Cambodia. For example, Le Tri Tue, a Vietnamese dissident, disappeared in Phnom Penh in 2007 after applying for asylum and remains missing.

Failure to effectively investigate his abduction calls into question the authorities’ compliance with Cambodia’s obligations under the International Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance (ICPPED), to which Cambodia became a state party in 2013. Specifically, Cambodia is in violation of its duties under international human rights law to undertake a thorough and impartial investigation without delay, take necessary measures to hold those involved criminally responsible, and guarantee access to information to the families of the victims and those with a legitimate interest. In addition, unconscionable delays in the search for a disappeared person are inconsistent with the Guiding Principles for the search for disappeared persons, including to presume the person is alive, respect human dignity, begin without delay, use information in an appropriate manner, and respect that the search is a continuing obligation until the fate of the disappeared is known.

The CED opened its 22nd session on 28 March and will develop a List of Issues that will form the basis for the review of Cambodia’s first report under Article 29 of the ICPPED. This report was due in 2015 but was not submitted by the Cambodian government until 2021.

This joint statement is endorsed by:
1. Sitanan Satsaksit and Family
2. Affiliated Network for Social Accountability (ANSA), Cambodia
3. Alliance for Conflict Transformation (ACT), Cambodia
4. Ain o Salish Kendra (ASK), Bangladesh
5. Asian Forum for Human Rights and Development (FORUM-ASIA)
6. Asian Resource Foundation (ARF), Thailand
7. Association of Women for Awareness & Motivation (AWAM), Pakistan
8. Banglar Manabadhikar Suraksha Mancha (MASUM), India
9. Bytes for All, Pakistan
10. Cambodia’s Independent Civil Servants Association (CICA)
11. Cambodian Center for Human Rights (CCHR)
12. Cambodian Food and Service Workers’ Federation (CFSWF), Cambodia
13. Cambodian Human Rights and Development Association (ADHOC), Cambodia
14. Cambodian Institute for Democracy (CID), Cambodia
15. Cambodian League for the Promotion and Defense of Human Rights (LICADHO), Cambodia
16. Cambodian Youth Network (CYN), Cambodia
17. Center for Alliance of Labor and Human Rights (CENTRAL), Cambodia
18. Center for Human Rights and Development (CHRD), Mongolia
19. Center for Prisoners’ Rights (CPR), Japan
20. Coalition of Cambodian Farmers Community Association (CCFC), Cambodia
21. Committee for Free and Fair Elections in Cambodia (COMFREL), Cambodia
22. Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative (CHRI), India
23. Cross Cultural Foundation (CrCF), Thailand
24. Defence of Human Rights (DHR), Pakistan
25. Dignity-Kadyr-kassiyet (KK), Kazakhstan
26. Equitable Cambodia (EC), Cambodia
27. Human Rights Commission of Pakistan, Pakistan
28. Human Rights Lawyers Association (HRLA), Thailand
29. Independent Democracy of Informal Economy Association (IDEA), Cambodia
30. The Indonesian Human Rights Monitor – Inisiatif Masyarakat Partisipatif untuk Transisi Berkeadilan (Imparsial), Indonesia
31. International Federation for Human Rights (FIDH)
32. Korean House for International Solidarity (KHIS), South Korea
33. League for the Defence of Human Rights in Iran (LDDHI), Iran
34. Madaripur Legal Aid Association (MLAA), Bangladesh
35. Maldivian Democracy Network (MDN), Maldives
36. Manushya Foundation, Thailand
37. Odhikar, Bangladesh
38. People’s Empowerment Foundation (PEF), Thailand
39. People’s Watch, India
40. Programme Against Custodial Torture & Impunity (PACTI), India
41. Progressive Voice, Myanmar
42. Safety and Risk Mitigation Organization (SRMO), Afghanistan
43. Sahmakum Teang Tnaut (STT), Cambodia
44. Suara Rakyat Malaysia (SUARAM), Malaysia
45. Thai Lawyers for Human Rights (TLHR), Thailand
46. The Cambodian NGO Committee on CEDAW (NGO-CEDAW), Cambodia
47. Think Centre, Singapore
48. Transparency International Cambodia (TIC)
49. Vietnam Committee on Human Rights (VCHR), Vietnam
50. Youth Resources Development Program (YRDP)

PDF format:  Download full statement in Khmer Download full statement in English

Joint statement Stop Escalating Crackdown on LRSU Strikers

25 March 2022

Authorities have alarmingly escalated the use of violence and mass detention of union members in front of NagaWorld casino in recent weeks, as well as increasing restrictions placed on human rights monitors and journalists covering the authorities’ worsening crackdown. We, the undersigned civil society groups, urge the government to de-escalate the situation and stop the repeated intimidation of strikers, including driving them to various areas far from the city center and leaving them stranded there late at night.

We are concerned by recent actions from authorities prohibiting human rights monitors and journalists from observing the continued use of violence against peaceful strikers, most of whom are women. On multiple occasions, authorities have barred human rights monitors and journalists from taking photographs or standing near the site of these heavy-handed detentions. Journalists have been threatened with arrest for covering the strike, and in several cases authorities have pushed monitors and journalists away as authorities violently drag strikers onto buses. They have also threatened to detain monitors alongside strikers at Covid-19 quarantine centers.

In some cases, authorities have forced monitors to delete photographs and videos of the incidents – further showing that these abusive arrests are a source of shame, and are not justified under domestic or international law. If observers continue to be restricted, we fear that there may be a further increase in violence and abuse during this crackdown.

In addition, in recent days authorities have put strikers into city buses and driven them to the outskirts of the city, dropping them off and forcing them to arrange and pay for their own transport home. This is entirely arbitrary and serves only to punish workers without any legal justification, reasoning or authority.

Women strikers from LRSU have also been targeted with violence, sexual harassment, imprisonment, and arbitrary application of COVID-19 measures in response to their peaceful strike since December 2021. On 29 December 2021, in an incident captured on video, authorities used vulgar sexual language toward a striker and threatened to sexually assault her. On 22 February, a male officer grabbed and squeezed the breast of one striker as she was being forced onto a bus. On 22 March, a woman striker was hit in the eye by authorities while being detained. These actions are unacceptable.

LRSU has conducted their strike peacefully and within the framework of Cambodian and international law, which guarantees the rights to assembly and free association. Yet the government’s response to the strike has been to arrest 11 union members, activists and leaders on trumped-up charges, which still hang over their heads despite their release on bail. Authorities have also regularly arrested and temporarily detained hundreds of additional LRSU strikers on a near-daily basis, arbitrarily sending them to Covid-19 quarantine centers or, more recently, dropping them off in remote areas of the city.

We call on authorities to de-escalate this situation and to take genuine steps toward resolving the dispute, including ensuring that NagaWorld participates in negotiations in good faith and in alignment with Cambodian law.

 

This joint statement endorsed by:

  1. 197 Land Community (Koh Kong)
  2. Affiliated Network for Social Accountability (ANSA)
  3. Alliance for Conflict Transformation (ACT)
  4. Am Leang Community (Kampong Speu)
  5. Andong Trabek Land Community (Svay Rieng)
  6. Areng Indigenous Community (Koh Kong)
  7. Association of Domestic Workers (ADW)
  8. Building and Wood Workers Trade Union Federation of Cambodia (BWTUC)
  9. Boeung Pram Community (Battambang)
  10. Bos Snor Community (Tbong Khmum)
  11. Cambodian Alliance of Trade Unions (CATU)
  12. Cambodian Center for Human Rights (CCHR)
  13. Cambodian Center for Independent Media (CCIM)
  14. Cambodian Food and Service Workers’ Federation (CFSWF)
  15. Center for Alliance of Labor and Human Rights (CENTRAL)
  16. Cambodian Human Rights and Development Association (ADHOC)
  17. Cambodia’s Independent Civil Servants Association (CICA)
  18. Cambodian Informal Economy Workers Association (CIWA-CLC)
  19. Cambodian Labor Confederation (CLC)
  20. Cambodian Tourism Workers Union Federation (CTWUF)
  21. Cambodian Journalists Alliance (CamboJA)
  22. Chi Kha Kraom Land Community (Koh Kong)
  23. Chi Kha Leu Land Community (Koh Kong)
  24. Coalition for Integrity and Social Accountability (CISA)
  25. Coalition of Cambodian Farmers Community Association (CCFC)
  26. Community to Protect Nature (Pursat)
  27. Committee for Free and Fair Elections in Cambodia (COMFREL)
  28. Cambodian Youth Network (CYN)
  29. Dak Por Community (Kampong Speu)
  30. Equitable Cambodia (EC)
  31. Gender and Development Cambodia (GADC)
  32. Haong Samnam Community (Kampong Speu)
  33. Independent Democracy of Informal Economy Association (IDEA)
  34. Independent Trade Union Federation (INTUFE)
  35. Kamprers community (Tboung Khmum)
  36. Khmer Student Intelligent League Association (KSILA)
  37. Khmer Thavrak
  38. Klaing Toek 78 Community (Siemreap)
  39. Koh Sralao Fishery Community (Koh Kong)
  40. Kouy​ Indigenous​​ Community (Preah Vihear)
  41. Labour Right Supported Union Khmer Employee of Nagaworld (L.R.S.U)
  42. Lor Peang Community (Kampong Chhnang)
  43. Mean Chey Land Community (Svay Rieng)
  44. Neutral and Impartial Committee for Free and Fair Elections in Cambodia (NICFEC)
  45. Peace Bridges Organization (PBO)
  46. Peam Ros Community (Kampong Speu)
  47. People Center for Development and Peace (PDP)
  48. Phnom Krom Community (Siemreap)
  49. Phnom Tnaut Community (Kampot)
  50. Phum Sela Khmer Land Community (Banteay Meanchey)
  51. Ponlok Khmer (PKH)
  52. Prek Ksach Land Community (Koh Kong)
  53. Prey Chher Pech Changvar Laor Chhert Community (Kampong Chhnang)
  54. Prey Lang Community (Stung Treng)
  55. Prey Lang Community (Kampong Thom)
  56. Prey Peay Fishery Community (Kampot)
  57. Ou Vor Preng Community (Battambang)
  58. Reaksmei Sameakki Community (Kampong Speu)
  59. Samaki Chek Meas Community (Svay Rieng)
  60. Solidarity House (SH)
  61. Sahmakum Teang Tnaut (STT)
  62. Sre Ampel Water Fall Tourism Forestry Community (Kampong Chhnang)
  63. Sre Prang Community (Tboung Khmum)
  64. Steung Khsach Sor Forestry Resource (Kampong Chhnang)
  65. Ta Ni Land Community (Siemreap)
  66. Ta Noun Land Community (Koh Kong)
  67. The Cambodian NGO Committee on CEDAW (NGO-CEDAW)
  68. Thmar Da Community (Pursat)
  69. Tonlung Community (Tboung Khmum)
  70. Transparency International Cambodia (TI)
  71. Trapeang Chour Community (Kampong Speu)
  72. Youth Resources Development Program (YRDP)

FACTS AND FIGURES #46: COVID-19 and the help provided

A new research study by Sahmakum Teang Tnaut titled “COVID-19 and the help provided” assesses the Government’s actions during the COVID-19 pandemic and compares them to community requests for help. The research process consisted of interviews with 45 community members. On 28 April 2020, communities from around the country went to meet with Government officials to submit a joint request signed by 141 communities calling for help at the beginning of the COVID-19 outbreak. Communities from around the country submitted five key requests to the Government in 2020, and this research measures the Government’s responses and actions. The 5 requests to the government are: Distribute preventative medical supplies to the most vulnerable; Ease or suspend debt to MFIs, banks, and private money-leaders; Rental suspension, and suspension of all taxes on sales; Stay at home payments; and Relocation and eviction issues.

This research finds that the Government did not respond to all the requests for help from communities. The Government reacted to help communities in some ways and did not react at all to other requests. The Government provided medical supplies to communities, offered payments, and enacted policies to reduce MFI debts. However, communities reported that the Government did not respond to requests to stop evicting communities even during a global pandemic. At least 11 communities from around Phnom Penh were evicted or issued with a notice to evict during the COVID-19 pandemic. The Government did not suspend rental payments despite direct requests from 37 of the 45 communities that STT interviewed. The request was made because income for workers throughout communities had decreased or workers had lost their jobs. Many families who rented houses or areas to sell or do business had less income to pay rental fees.

Mrs. Lay Srey Met, representative of Prek Ta Kong 60m community, said:

“During the COVID-19 outbreak, my income went down because sales were not as good as before. Because there are so many difficulties in daily life. “I and all community members have submitted a request to the government, but we have not received any assistance or response from the government”

You can find out more in our report, which can be accessed at: https://teangtnaut.org/?lang=en

You can download the reports as PDF files here! Khmer – English

For further information please contact: 

Mr. Soeung Saran, Executive Director of Sahmakum Teang Tnaut.

Tel: 089 666 013

Email: director@teangtnaut.org

Mrs. Prak Sotheary, Research Advocacy Advisor at Sahmakum Teang Tnaut.

Tel: 012 464 500

Email: advisor1@teangtnaut.org

 

Joint Statement: Abolish Slave Compounds in Cambodia

March 10, 2022 – We are deeply disturbed by reports of widespread human trafficking into Cambodia leading to forced labour, slavery and torture at compounds across the country. Dozens of media reports and numerous victim accounts collected by local and international organisations suggest that thousands of people, mostly foreign nationals, are entrapped in these situations. We call on the government to take meaningful and coordinated action to respond to these gross human rights violations, and to investigate alleged complicity between some government authorities and the criminal enterprises.

Media reports and victim accounts indicate these abuses involve foreign citizens who are kidnapped, sold, trafficked or tricked into accepting jobs in Cambodia. Once in Cambodia, they are detained in large compounds and forced to work, often conducting online scam operations targeting foreign nationals outside the country. Workers who escape report having faced physical and mental threats and violence at the hands of their captors. Reports indicate that most compounds are located in Sihanoukville, yet similar abuses have been reported in Phnom Penh, Pursat, Koh Kong and other provinces.

This grave reality has been recognised by numerous foreign embassies. Indonesia issued a warning regarding the situation in January 2021; Vietnam warned its citizens of such operations in June 2021; the Thai government issued a warning in November 2021; the Pakistan Embassy reported rescuing four citizens in January 2022; and the Chinese Embassy has published multiple statements and warnings regarding such operations. Thai police have expressed concern and recently stepped-up efforts to intervene in cases where Thai citizens have been trafficked and become trapped in these compounds.

Local and international journalists have been central to bringing this human rights crisis to light, reporting on the victims, perpetrators, and government institutions involved in these operations. Reports have implicated a well-known Cambodian tycoon and a ruling party senator as being connected to some of the operations.

While some Cambodian authorities have responded to a handful of individual complaints, this crisis cannot be resolved on a case-by-case basis. A coordinated and targeted response is urgently needed from the Cambodian government, local and international organisations, UN bodies, and other governments to respond to the magnitude of this crisis. We urge the Cambodian government to fulfil its responsibility to fully investigate the abuses within its territory; abolish all compounds linked with illegal gambling and fraud operations, and the associated forced labour, slavery or torture; ensure that those entrapped are released and provided with safety; and prosecute all those responsible in accordance with Cambodian law.

The continued existence of these operations is a tragedy, and we are horrified that Cambodia is being used as a base for such inhumanity. All relevant actors must immediately guarantee that no one is subject to slavery or torture within Cambodia.

This statement endorsed by:

1. Alliance for Conflict Transformation (ACT)
2. Association of Domestic Workers (ADW)
3. Asian Forum for Human Rights and Development (FORUM-ASIA)
4. Bytes for All, Pakistan
5. Cambodian Center for Human Rights (CCHR)
6. Cambodian Human Rights and Development Association (ADHOC)
7. Cambodian League for the Promotion and Defense of Human Rights (LICADHO)
8. Center for Alliance of Labor and Human Rights (CENTRAL)
9. Centre for Human Rights and Development, Mongolia
10. Coalition of Cambodian Farmers Community Association (CCFC)
11. Cambodian Food and Service Workers’ Federation (CFSWF)
12. Committee for Free and Fair Elections in Cambodia (COMFREL)
13. Cambodian Center for Independent Media (CCIM)
14. Cambodian Institute for Democracy (CID)
15. Cambodian Youth Network (CYN)
16. Defense of Human Rights & Public Service Trust, Pakistan
17. Equitable Cambodia (EC)
18. Gender and Development for Cambodia (GADC)
19. Independent Democracy of Informal Economy Association (IDEA)
20. Initiativ Kambodja (IK)
21. International Justice Mission (IJM)
22. M’Lop Tapang
23. Neutral and Impartial Committee for Free and Fair Elections in Cambodia (NICFEC)
24. Odhikar, Bangladesh
25. Peace Bridges Organization (PBO)
26. People Center for Development and Peace (PDP-Center)
27. People’s Empowerment Foundation, Thailand
28. Sahmakum Teang Tnaut – (STT)
29. Society for the Protection of the Rights of the Child (SPARC), Pakistan
30. Transparency International Cambodia (TI)
31. The Cambodian NGO Committee on CEDAW (NGO-CEDAW)
32. Suara Rakyat Malaysia (SUARAM), Malaysia
33. Women’s Rehabilitation Centre (WOREC), Nepal
34. Think Centre, Singapore
35. Banglar Manabadhikar Suraksha Mancha (MASUM), India
36. Progressive Voice, Myanmar

For more information, please contact:
▪ Mr. Am Sam Ath, Operations Director LICADHO – (+855) 10 327 770 (Khmer)
▪ Mr. Jake Sims, Country Director IJM – (+855) 12901446 (English)

PDF format: Download full statement in KhmerDownload full statement in English

JOINT STATEMENT Authorities Must Immediately Stop Using Violence and Arbitrary Application of Laws Against Peaceful Women Strikers

February 24, 2022 – We, the undersigned civil society groups, communities and trade unions, are dismayed by recent incidents of state-sponsored violence, including sexual harassment, against Cambodian women engaged in peaceful strikes and assemblies. Members of the Labor Rights Supported Union of Khmer Employees of NagaWorld (LRSU) – most of whom are women – have been subjected to violence, imprisonment, and arbitrary application of COVID-19 measures in response to their peaceful strike since December 2021.

Authorities have repeatedly pushed, dragged and carried peaceful strikers onto buses to take them to a COVID-19 quarantine centre in Prek Phnov district, Phnom Penh this week. On 22 February 2022, a male officer grabbed and squeezed the breast of one woman as she was being forced onto a bus. Similarly, on 29 December 2021, state authorities used vulgar sexual language toward a striker and threatened to sexually assault her.

Women strikers have been repeatedly and disproportionately targeted by government efforts to disperse the peaceful strike. During January, strikers were arbitarily denied access to bathrooms nearby the strike site, which were reopened daily as strikers returned home. Authorities have prevented strikers from returning home until after dark on multiple occasions, and at times followed them when they have been permitted to leave.

This month, strikers have repeatedly complied with orders to undertake multiple COVID-19 tests and fulfiled quarantine orders. Despite meeting such demands, on 21 February 2022, 64 strikers – 56 women and eight men – were forcibly taken to a quarantine facility as they attempted to resume their strike and were only permitted to return home late in the evening after complying with further COVID-19 testing. The next day, 39 strikers – 31 women and eight men – were forcibly taken to the same quarantine centre. Strikers reported that the facility does not have adequate access to water for bathing or drinking or adequate sleeping areas. The following afternoon, 51 additional strikers – 41 women and 10 men – were sent to the same quarantine centre. They have each been fined up to 2 million riel (US$500) for allegedly violating COVID-19 measures as they attempted to resume their strike. Strikers detained since Tuesday have not been released from the quarantine centre.

Meanwhile, 11 LRSU members and leaders, including seven women, have been arrested since December 2021, in retaliation for their peaceful and legitimate exercise of freedom of assembly and freedom of association. They are currently in pre-trial detention. The seven women have been charged with incitement to commit a felony under Cambodia’s Criminal Code and face up to two years in overcrowded prisons if convicted.

State-sanctioned violence against women, arbitrary enforcement of COVID-19 mitigation measures, and the use of the judiciary to stifle public participation are unjustified and unlawful under both international and domestic law. In particular, they violate the constitutional right to peaceful assembly and rights under the UN Convention on the Elimination of all forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW) as interpreted in the CEDAW General Recommendations Nos. 30 (regarding women in conflict, “including protracted and low-intensity civil strife, political strife”) and 35 (regarding gender-based violence).

Women’s rights violations continue to be rampant in Cambodia, with many women reporting feeling less free than men to exercise their fundamental rights, including their rights to speech and assembly. The COVID-19 pandemic has taken a particularly heavy toll on women in Cambodia: many have suffered its economic impacts since the most affected industries, including entertainment, garment, and hospitality, employ a larger share of women than other sectors. In these challenging times, women need increased guarantees to exercise their rights and support, and civil society cannot remain silent in the face of the violence committed against them, all the more when such abuses are committed by the very authorities whose mission is to protect them.

We remind the RGC of its commitments to CEDAW and the Committee’s recommendation in paragraph 9 from November 2019 to fully guarantee the rights of women human rights defenders, trade union leaders, land and environmental activists and members of the political opposition party, particularly their rights to freedom of expression, assembly and association, without harassment, surveillance or other undue restrictions. We strongly urge the government to adopt standards on gender-responsive policing and to mandate gender trainings for police, military, and other security acting on behalf of the state so that they conduct themselves in a professional, ethical, and gender-responsive and sensitive manner whenever they interact with members of the public. We call for all women to be free to resume their peaceful strikes and exercise their fundamental rights without discrimination, and for all imprisoned unionists to be immediately and unconditionally released with all charges dropped.

This joint statement endorsed by:
1. ActionAid Cambodia (AAC)
2. Association to Support Vulnerable Women (ASVW)
3. Banteay Srei (BS)
4. Building Community Voices (BCV)
5. Cambodia Labor Confederation (CLC)
6. Cambodian Center for Human Rights (CCHR)
7. Cambodian Center for Independent Media (CCIM)
8. Cambodian Food and Service Workers’ Federation (CFSWF)
9. Cambodian Human Rights and Development Association (ADHOC)
10. Cambodian League for the Promotion and Defense of Human Rights (LICADHO)
11. Cambodian Youth Network (CYN)
12. Cambodian Women’s Crisis Center (CWCC)
13. Center for Alliance of Labor and Human Rights (CENTRAL)
14. Coalition of Cambodian Farmer Community (CCFC)
15. Committee for Free and Fair Elections in Cambodia (COMFREL)
16. Gender and Development for Cambodia (GADC)
17. Independent Democracy of Informal Economy Association (IDEA)
18. Independent Trade Union Federation (INTUFE)
19. Klahaan Organization (Klahaan)
20. Neutral and Impartial Committee for Free and Fair Elections in Cambodia (NICFEC)
21. Sahmakum Teang Tnaut (STT)
22. The Cambodian NGO Committee on CEDAW (NGO-CEDAW)
23. Urban Poor Women Development (UPWD)
24. Women Peace Makers (WPM)
25. Youth Resource Development Program (YRDP) Cambodia
26. 197 Land Community (Koh Kong)
27. Am Leang Community (Kampong Speu)
28. Andong Trabek Land Community (Svay Rieng)
29. Areng Indigenous Community (Koh Kong)
30. Boeung Pram Community (Battambang)
31. Bos Snor Community (Tbong Khmum)
32. Chi Kha Leu Land Community (Koh Kong)
33. Community to Protect Nature (Pursat)
34. Dak Por Community (Kampong Speu)
35. Gender and Development network (GADNet)
36. Kompres Community (Tboung Khmum)
37. Klaing Teuk 78 Community (Siem Reap)
38. Kouy Indigenous Community (Preah Vihear)
39. Land Community (Pailin)
40. Ou Vor Preng Community (Battambang)
41. Peam Ros Community (Kampong Speu)
42. Phum Sela Khmer Land Community (Banteay Meanchey)
43. Prey Lang Community (Kampong Thom)
44. Prey Peay Land Community (Kampot)
45. Reaksmei Sameakki Community (Kampong Speu)
46. Sre Ampel Water Fall Tourism Forestry Community (Kampong Chhnang)
47. Sre Prang Community (Tboung Khmum)
48. Ta Noun Land Community (Koh Kong)
49. Thmar Da Community (Pursat)
50. Tonlung Community (Tboung Khmum)
51. Trapeang Pring Community (Tboung Khmum)

PDF format:  Download full statement in Khmer Download full statement in English

POVERTY ASSESSMENT This new report shows that urban poor communities are facing issues that need to be addressed urgently.

23 February 2022

This report is an assessment of poverty in urban poor communities in Phnom Penh. This report has found many concerning trends with regards to land and tenure security, and access to food and public services, all of which should be addressed as a matter of urgency by local authorities, and the government. 958 households were selected for interviews for this study, which constitutes an insight into the situation of 42 urban poor communities around Phnom Penh.

One of the findings listed in this report is the worrying lack of family documentation for urban communities.  47% of respondents claimed not to have their family book at home. This is especially concerning as family books are crucial for being able to vote, or to be registered for ID poor. The ID poor system has itself been strongly criticised by community members:

‘Nearly two thirds (64%) of respondents expressed the need for further assessment to be carried out for ID Poor. Respondents stated that they believe the system has missed poor families who are eligible for ID Poor.’ (Poverty Assessment, STT) 

The absence of a family book or registration onto the ID poor system can cause risks regarding tenure security. A family book is necessary to obtain ID poor status. This is especially urgent as the report has also found that some families have faced forced evictions over the last five years. The study has found that almost 50 respondents have endured forced evictions during that timeframe.

While this report highlights ongoing issues related to evictions, the report delves deeper into the social intricacies of housing and shelter, access to healthcare, food, and electricity, family vulnerabilities, and debt. Poverty has continued to affect many urban communities throughout Phnom Penh, and this has been exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic. Saran Soeung, the executive director of STT explains:

‘Urban poverty is mostly disregarded. There are many problems ranging from income insecurity, land tenure security, health care, children’s education, and sanitation. These problems seem to have been overlooked by relevant stakeholders. Communities are increasingly at risk of an extensive range of vulnerabilities.’ (Saran Soeung, Executive Director, STT)

Concerning the threat of evictions, local authorities and the government need to facilitate dialogue between urban poor communities and potential evictees. This report has shown that victims of forced evictions are typically faced with threats, intimidation, and humiliation. There needs to be community consultations, transparency, and ongoing dialogue with relevant government institutions when a big development project has the potential to cause displacement and eviction.

You can download the reports as PDF files here! Khmer – English

For further information please contact: 

Mr. Soeung Saran, Executive Director of Sahmakum Teang Tnaut.

Tel: 089 666 013

Email: director@teangtnaut.org

Mrs. Prak Sotheary, Research Advocacy Advisor at Sahmakum Teang Tnaut.

Tel: 012 464 500

Email: advisor1@teangtnaut.org

Joint Statement Release and drop the charges against Mr. Chhorn Phalla, a forest activist in Rattanakiri Province

Phnom Penh, 10 February 2022 – We,​ the undersigned civil society groups, trade unions and communities are extremely disappointed and concerned over the conviction of Mr. Chhorn Phalla, who was sentenced to five years imprisonment by the Rattanakiri Provincial Court on 10 November 2021 after a hearing on 29 September 2021. During that hearing the prosecutor changed the charge against Chhorn Phalla from “fell trees, encroached and cleared forest land, set forest fire, and bulldozed forestlands to claim ownership” under Article 62 of the Law on Natural Protected Areas to “clear forestland and enclose it to claim for ownership” under Article 97 (6) of the Law on Forestry, without substantial evidence to support this change. The change of the charges violated Chhorn Phalla’s fair trial rights, as it affected his right to have adequate time to prepare his defense. The court nevertheless convicted Chhorn Phalla under the new charges and sentenced him to five years imprisonment. During the trial, witnesses stated that Chhorn Phalla did not clear forestland and enclosed it to claim for ownership. Chhorn Phalla himself confirmed that he does not own any piece of land in that area.

Chhorn Phalla has been active in the protection of forests and natural resources in Seda commune, Lumphat district, Rattanakiri province for more than ten years. Along with other activists, he monitors forest and natural resources destruction, collects information and documents evidence of this destruction to file lawsuits against competent authorities who fail to perform their duties in protecting natural resources and forest land, thus allowing perpetrators to destroy the forest and natural resources in violation of the Law on Forestry and the Law on Natural Protected Areas. Due to his activism, Chhorn Phalla was attacked on 8 July 2020 by a group of people close to the authorities, after he raised the issue of deforestation and destruction of natural resources during a forum organized by the authorities in Seda commune hall, Lumphat district, Rattanakiri province. After the attack, Chhorn Phalla filed a complaint to the Rattanakiri Provincial Court. However, no action has been taken against the suspects.

Chhorn Phalla has been detained in Rattanakiri provincial prison for more than four months since his arrest on 20 September 2021  while he was checking the voters’ list at the police station in Seda commune, Lumphat district, Rattanakiri province. The Rattanakiri Provincial Court’s unfair decision against Chhorn Phalla amounts to judicial harassment and aims to threaten, intimidate and frighten him, as well as other environmental activists who are actively involved in protecting forests and natural resources.

We urge the judiciary and relevant institutions to drop the charges against Chhorn Phalla and to release him unconditionally. We hope the government will remember its obligation to preserve and protect the environment and the natural resources of Cambodia, and to guarantee the rights and freedoms of individuals to take part in the life of the nation.

This statement is endorsed by:

  1. Cambodian League for the Promotion and Defense of Human Rights (LICADHO)
  2. Cambodian Center for Human Rights (CCHR)
  3. Cambodian Human Rights and Development Association (ADHOC)
  4. Committee for Free and Fair Elections in Cambodia (COMFREL)
  5. Center for Alliance of Labor and Human Rights (CENTRAL)
  6. Alliance for Conflict Transformation (ACT)
  7. Coalition of Cambodian Farmers Community (CCFC)
  8. Youth Resources Development Program (YRDP)
  9. Peace Bridges Organization (PBO)
  10. Cambodian Institute for Democracy (CID)
  11. People Center for Development and Peace (PDP Center)
  12. Coalition for Integrity and Social Accountability (CISA)
  13. Cambodia’s Independent Civil Servants Association (CICA)
  14. Cambodian Youth Network (CYN)
  15. Sahmakum Teang Tnaut (STT)
  16. Affiliated Network for Social Accountability (ANSA)
  17. Boeung Pram Community (Battambang)
  18. O’Vor Preng Community (Battambang)
  19. Pailin Land Community
  20. Chakrei Land Community (Banteay Meanchey)
  21. Phum Sela Khmer Land Community (Banteay Meanchey)
  22. Community to Protect Nature (Pursat)
  23. Thmar Da Community (Pursat)
  24. O’Chamsrey Tradakpong Community (Kampong Thom)
  25. Kouy Indigenous Community (Preah Vihear)
  26. Peam Ros Community (Kampong Speu)
  27. Prey Peay Community (Kampot)
  28. Samaki Sangkae Pi Meanrith Community (Preah Vihear)
  29. Prey Lang Community (Stung Treng)
  30. 197 Land Community (Koh Kong)
  31. Areng Indigenous Community (Koh Kong)
  32. Chi Kha Kraom Land Community (Koh Kong)
  33. Koh Sralao Fishery Community (Koh Kong)
  34. Chi Kha Leu Land Community (Koh Kong)
  35. Ta Noun Land Community (Koh Kong)
  36. Bos Snor Community (Tboung Khmum)
  37. Sre Prang Community (Tboung Khmum)
  38. Tunlung Community (Tboung Khmum)
  39. Sre Ampel Water Fall Tourism Forest Community (Kampong Chhnang)
  40. Steung Khsach Sor Forestry Resource (Kampong Chhnang)
  41. Charay Indigenous Community (Rattanakiri)
  42. Am Laeng Community (Kampong Speu)
  43. Building and Wood Worker’s Trade Union Federation of Cambodia (BWTUC)
  44. Cambodian Alliance of Trade Unions (CATU)
  45. Independent Trade Union Federation (INTUFE)
  46. Cambodian Tourism Workers Union Federation (CTWUF)
  47. Khlaeng Teok 78 Community (Siem Reap)
  48. Tany Land Community (Siem Reap)
  49. Andong Trabek Land Community (Svay Rieng)
  50. Samaki Chek Meas Community (Svay Rieng)
  51. Mean Chey Community (Svay Rieng)
  52. Prey Lang Community (Kampong Thom)
  53. Raksmei Samaki Community (Kampong Speu)
  54. Human Right Defender Network (Kratie)
  55. Broma Roub Roum Community (Kratie)
  56. Sambok Community (Kratie)
  57. Tamao Community (Kratie)
  58. Da Community (Kratie)
  59. Chang Krang Community (Kratie)
  60. Kantout Community (Kratie)
  61. Saob Community (Kratie)
  62. Kra-nhung Senchey Community (Kratie)
  63. Kbal Damrei Community (Kratie)
  64. Prek Saman Community (Kratie)
  65. Human Right Defender Network (Tboung Khmum)
  66. Praphat Community (Tboung Khmum)
  67. Bey Met Community (Tboung Khmum)
  68. Chaom Kravean Community (Tboung Khmum)
  69. Trapaeng Pring Community (Tboung Khmum)
  70. Chan Moul Community (Tboung Khmum)
  71. Kambrers Community (Tboung Khmum)
  72. Indigenous Community Network Working Group (Mundulkiri)
  73. Tbaeng Commune Land Community (Siem Reap)
  74. Khnar Sanday Commune Land Community (Siem Reap)
  75. Paek Sneng Commune Land Community (Siem Reap)
  76. Leang Dai Commune Land Community (Siem Reap)
  77. Svay Leur Community (Siem Reap)
  78. Ta Siem Community (Siem Reap)
  79. Beong Meala Community (Siem Reap)
  80. Samrong Community (Siem Reap)
  81. Sre Noy Community (Siem Reap)
  82. Spean Thnaot Community (Siem Reap)
  83. Chan Sar Community (Siem Reap)
  84. Ta Yaek Community (Siem Reap)
  85. Romney Commune Community (Preah Vihear)
  86. Romtom Commune Community (Preah Vihear)
  87. Mlou Prey 1 Commune Community (Preah Vihear)
  88. Mlou Prey 2 Commune Community (Preah Vihear)
  89. Sa-ang Commune Community (Preah Vihear)
  90. Tarsou Commune Community (Preah Vihear)
  91. Sangkae 1 Commune Community (Preah Vihear)
  92. Reaksa Commune Community (Preah Vihear)
  93. Chaep 1 Commune Community (Preah Vihear)
  94. Tbaeng 1 Commune Community (Preah Vihear)
  95. Tbaeng 2 Commune Community (Preah Vihear)
  96. Chamroeun Commune Community (Preah Vihear)
  97. Sra Yorng Commune Community (Preah Vihear)
  98. Thmea Commune Community (Preah Vihear)
  99. Por Commune Community (Preah Vihear)
  100. Puttrea Commune Community (Preah Vihear)
  101. Ro Ang Commune Community (Preah Vihear)
  102. Human Right Defender Network (Steong Treng)
  103. Bos Sbov Commune Community (Banteay Meanchy)
  104. Poychar Community (Banteay Meanchey)
  105. Pich Changva Community (Kampong Chhnang)
  106. Anchanh Rong Community (Kampong Chhnang)
  107. Choam Sangkea Community (Kampong Speu)
  108. Phnom Chi Community (Banteay Meanchey)
  109. Kbal Tuek Commune Community (Kampong Chhnang)
  110. Boeng Bram Community ( Battambang )
  111. DonTri Community ( Battambang )
  112. Sdey Krom Rohal Soung Community ( Battambang )
  113. Cambodian Human Rights Action Coalition ( CHRAC )

Open letter from civil society organizations Request for NagaWorld Labor Dispute Resolution and Release and Dismissal Charges against 8 union leaders and activists

 មើលឯកសារនេះជាភាសាខ្មែរ (PDF, 329.37 KBs) មើលឯកសារនេះជាភាសាអង់គ្លេស (PDF, 636.27 KBs)
Download this document in English

We, the undersigned civil society organizations working on the promotion and protection of human rights labor rights, land rights , environmental activists, independent analyst and social researcher in the Kingdom of Cambodia, wish to inform His Excellency of our deep disappointment at the authorities’ abuse of the Cambodian legal framework to wrongly arrest, detain and charge eight union leaders and continues to arrest more union activists for their peaceful exercise of freedom of association and freedom of assembly, both of which are protected in domestic and international law.

The charge of incitement to commit a felony levied against the union leaders and activists sends the message to Naga World strikers that their labor rights can be flouted with impunity while they will face legal action merely for calling out their company’s labor violations and seeking redress. This could set a dangerous precedent, emboldening employers to ignore inconvenient labor standards, and potentially leading to a roll-back of hard-earned labor rights in Cambodia.

We call for the eight arrested union leaders and activists to be immediately released, and for the charges against them to be unconditionally dropped. We remind the Royal Government of Cambodia (“RGC”) that unionism is not a crime, and that fundamental freedoms must be safeguarded, even when they are exercised in pursuit of a cause that the RGC disagrees with. We further call on the RGC to urge Naga World, once the eight union leaders and activists have been released, to enter into genuine negotiations with the Naga World union with the aim of finding a fair and just resolution to their labor dispute.

In addition, the RGC must cease to accuse trade unions and civil society organizations of attempting to overthrow the Government via a “color revolution” every time they use the fundamental freedoms granted to them by the Cambodian Constitution and international human rights instruments ratified by Cambodia to voice their concerns and demand better respect for human rights. It is high time for the RGC to start appreciating the role that civil society plays in protecting human rights and promoting democracy in the Kingdom and to enable a safe environment for its members to operate freely and without fear of repercussion.

Therefore, we, the undersigned civil society organizations working on the promotion and protection of human rights and labor rights in Cambodia, request His Excellency to intervene in order to have the eight jailed union leaders and activists released and all charges against them dropped and to find a just and fair resolution to this labor dispute.

This open letter is signed by:
1. Hun Vannak (Khmer Thavrak)
2. Chhoeun Daravy (Khmer Thavrak)
3. Eng Malai(Khmer Thavrak)
4. Eng Vandy (Khmer Thavrak)
5. Svay Samnang (Khmer Thavrak)
6. Dr. Lao Mong Hay
7. Dr. Seng Sary
8. 197 Land Community (Koh Kong)
9. ActionAid Cambodia (AAC)
10. Andong Trabek Land Community (Svay Rieng)
11. Areng Indigenous Community (Koh Kong)
12. Bos Snor Community (Tbong Khmum)
13. Boeung Pram Community (Battambang)
14. Building and Wood Workers’ Trade Union Federation of Cambodia (BWTUC)
15. Cambodian Alliance of Trade Unions (CATU)
16. Cambodian Food and Service Workers’ Federation (CFSWF)
17. Cambodian Human Rights and Development Association (ADHOC)
18. Cambodian Center for Human Rights (CCHR)
19. Cambodian Institute for Democracy (CID)
20. Cambodian Informal Employment Reinforcement Association (CIERA)
21. Cambodia’s Independent Civil Servants Association (CICA)
22. Cambodian Informal Economy Workers Association (CIWA-CLC)
23. Cambodian Human Rights Action Coalition (CHRAC)
24. Cambodian League for the Promotion and Defense of Human Rights (LICADHO)
25. Cambodian Tourism Workers Union Federation (CTWUF)
26. Cambodian Youth Network (CYN)
27. Center for Alliance of Labor and Human Rights (CENTRAL)
28. Chi Kha Kraom Land Community (Koh Kong)
29. Coalition of Cambodian Apparel Workers’ Democratic Union (C.CAWDU)
30. Cambodia Labor Confederation (CLC)
31. Coalition of Cambodian Farmers Community Association (CCFC)
32. Coalition of Free Trade Unions of Women Textile (CFTUWT)
33. Committee for Free and Fair Elections in Cambodia (COMFREL)
34. Community Legal Education Center (CLEC)
35. Community to Protect Nature (Pursat)
36. Dak Por Community (Kampong Speu)
37. Equitable Cambodia (EC)
38. Federation of Free Trade Union of Workers of the Kingdom of Cambodia (FTUWKC)
39. Free and Independent Trade Union Federation (FUFI)
40. Gender and Development for Cambodia (GADC)
41. Independent Democracy of Informal Economy Association (IDEA)
42. Independent Trade Union Federation (INTUFE)
43. Indigenous Community in Prame Commune (Preah Vihear)
44. Khmer Kampuchea Krom for Human Rights and Development Association (KKKHRDA)
45. Kleang Toek 78 Community (Siemreap)
46. Koh Sralao Fishery Community (Koh Kong)
47. Kouy Indigenous Community (Preah Vihear)
48. Labour Right Supported Union Khmer Employee of Nagaworld (L.R.S.U)
49. Land Community (Pailin)
50. Mean Chey Land Community (Svay Rieng)
51. Ou Chamsrey Tradakpong Community (Kampong Thom)
52. Ou Vor Preng Community (Battambang)
53. Peam Ros Community (Kampong Speu)
54. Phum Sela Khmer Land Community (Banteay Meanchey)
55. Phnom Krom Community (Siemreap)
56. Prek Ksach Land Community (Koh Kong)
57. Prey Lang Community (Kampong Thom)
58. Prey Peay Fishery Community (Kampot)
59. Prey Chher Pech Changvar Laor Chhert Community (Kampong Chhnang)
60. Reaksmei Sameakki Community (Kampong Speu)
61. Sahmakum Teang Tnaut (STT)
62. Samaki Chek Meas Community (Svay Rieng)
63. Samaki Romeas Haek Community (Svay Rieng)
64. Samaki Sangkae Pir Mean Rith (Preah Vihear)
65. Solidarity House (SH)
66. Sre Ampel Water Fall Tourism Forestry Community (Kampong Chhnang)
67. Sre Prang Community (Tboung Khmum)
68. Steung Khsach Sor Forestry Resource (Kampong Chhnang)
69. Ta Noun Land Community (Koh Kong)
70. The Cambodia Confederation of Unions (CCU)
71. The Cambodian NGO Committee on CEDAW (NGO-CEDAW)
72. Thmar Da Community (Pursat)
73. Tonlung Community (Tboung Khmum)
74. Transparency International Cambodia (TI)
75. Workers’ Solidarity Strength Independent Union (WSSIU)
76. Youth Resources Development Program (YRDP)
77. Chongkom 1 community (Tboung Khmum)
78. Khnorng Kroper Lech community (Tboung Khmum)
79. Grassroots Farmer Community (Tboung Khmum)
80. Yerng Knhom Community (Tboung Khmum)
81. Chongkom Kandal community (Tboung Khmum)
82. Kompres community (Tboung Khmum)
83. Trapeang Pring Community (Tboung Khmum)
84. Brolos Community (Tboung Khmum)
85. Broma Robrom Community (Kratie)
86. Sombok Community (Kratie)
87. Women network for Trapeanng Pring community (Tboung Khmum)
88. Romeas Haek Rural Women Network (Svay Rieng)
89. Women Network for Meanchey Community (Svay Rieng)
90. Dak Por Women Community (Takeo)
91. Chok Chey Women Community (Takeo)
92. Women United for Spean Ches Community (Preah Sihanouk)
93. 843 Women Movement Alliance (Koh Kong)
94. Rural Youth Farmer Alliance (Koh Kong)
95. Preah Vihear Youth Farmer Group (Preah Vihear)
96. Tambae Meanchey Youth Network (Tboung Khmum)
97. Kampong Ampil Conservation Forest Community (Svay Rieng)
98. Sithprosre Community (Prey Veng)
99. Chong Ampil Land Community (Prey Veng)
100. Seang Kveang Community (Prey Veng)
101. Chrey Lerng Farmer Community (Prey Veng)
102. Phom Khnom Community (Kandal)
103. Thmar Thom Andoung Tuek Praek Trabek Community (Preah Sihanouk)
104. Ou Kampuchea Community (Preah Sihanouk)
105. Kbal Hong Tuek Communtiy (Preah Sihanouk)
106. Praek Traeng Community (Preah Sihanouk)
107. Pongrouk Community (Kampot)
108. Veal Veng Community (Kampot)
109. Ang Svay Farmer Community (Kampot)
110. Rural Farmer 129 Land Community (Koh Kong)
111. 843 Land Community (Koh Kong)
112. 766 Land Community (Koh Kong)
113. Nea Pisey Rural Land Community (Koh Kong)
114. Chambak Trang Farmer Community (Kampong Speu)
115. Odom Sre Kpos forest land community (Kompong Speu)
116. Human right promotion land community (Kandal)
117. Trey Sla community (Kandal)
118. Totol community (Kandal)
119. Ompov Prey community (Kandal)
120. Kotarear Community (Takeo)
121. Samaki community (Takeo)
122. Phum Kandal Community (Takeo)
123. Trapeang Krasang Community (Takeo)
124. Kanlaeng Khla Community (Takeo)
125. Sambo Community (Preah Vihear)
126. Russei Srok Community (Preah Vihear)
127. Chouk Chey Community (Preah Vihear)
128. Kalorth Community (Preah Vihear)
129. Ou Romdoul Land Community (Preah Vihear)
130. Phnom Ke Samaki Community (Preah Vihear)
131. Bos Community (Preah Vihear)
132. Tasou Meanrith Community (Preah Vihear)
133. Trapeang Rolous Community (Prey Veng)

 

Joint Statement Government Must Release NagaWorld Unionists and Respect Labour Rights

4th January 2022

We the undersigned civil society groups, including union federations, confederations, and associations as well as NGOs, are dismayed by the measures taken by authorities, led by the Phnom Penh Police Commissariat, to detain 9 union leaders and members on the night of December 31, 2021, and to further violently arrest LRSU union leader Chhim Sithar on the afternoon of January 4, 2022. We call for all arrested unionists’ immediate and unconditional release.

We support the exercise of the fundamental rights and freedoms of LRSU union members and employees to conduct a peaceful strike. This right is guaranteed under the Constitution, Labour Law, Law on Trade Unions, and based on the union’s statutes registered with the Ministry of Labour and Vocational Training as a professional and independent institution to protect the legal rights and interests of workers in the workplace. We are dismayed by the measures taken by authorities, who failed to uphold their roles and obligations to protect strikers who conduct a peaceful strike. Instead, the authorities arrested the union leaders and members, even at night, and improperly accused them of a crime.

We further note that most of those arrested, as well as those participating in the strike are women. Cambodian law, including the CEDAW Convention, entitles these workers to the peaceful exercise of speech, association, and union activity. Women workers make their own decisions about whether to stand up for their labor rights, and to suggest that they are not acting of their own volition is to deny the full agency and equality of women workers.

nowThe members of the NagaWorld union have used their right to strike, which is guaranteed under national law, as a measure of last resort to push their employer to negotiate and find a solution peacefully. A peaceful strike is not a crime. Authorities must stop intimidating and threatening union members with legal charges or with pro-government media propaganda.

Among the nine unionists detained on December 31, eight – Chhim Sokun, Sun Sreypich, Hai Sopheap, Ry Sovanndy, Rin Phalla, Eng Sreybo, Sun Sreymom, and Kleang Sobin – were arrested at the union office, while Touch Sereymeas was arrested while leaving the strike site in front of NagaWorld. The arrests of the nine were made after 2,000 members of the Labor Rights Supported Union of Khmer Employees of NagaWorld (LRSU) union conducted a peaceful strike for 13 days in order to demand NagaWorld re-instate 365 union leaders and members who were previously fired.

One day after the arrest, on January 1, 2022, the Phnom Penh Police Commissariat claimed that the arrests were made after the Phnom Penh Municipality announced many times that the strike was illegal and affected social security and public order. They claimed the arrests were made following Articles 494 and 495 of the Criminal Code.

After questioning, six union members and leaders – Chhim Sokhun, Kleang Sobin, Son Sreypich, Ry Sovanndy, Hai Sopheap, and Touch Sereymeas – were sent to Phnom Penh Municipal Court at around 5 p.m. on Sunday, January 2.

On the afternoon of Monday, January 3rd, the six were charged with incitement to commit a felony by prosecutor Seng Heang, according to Articles 494 and 495 of the Criminal Code, and three others were also charged – Chhim Sithar, Sok Narith and Sok Kongkea. The six detainees were sent to pre-trial detention at Correctional Centre 2 on Monday evening, while the additional three unionists were arrested on January 4, 2022. If convicted, these nine unionists face between six months and two years in prison.

On Monday afternoon, while the six leaders and members were being questioned, 400 members of the union continued to strike in front of Naga 2, and an additional 17 members were arrested (1 man and 16 women) and sent to the Phnom Penh Police Commissariat. One of the 17 detainees, a 3-month pregnant woman, was later released.

We, the civil society groups, call for authorities to drop all charges, release all detainees, and uphold their role as public servants professionally, with accountability and impartiality, in order to find a solution to this labour dispute. At the same time, we request Phnom Penh Municipal Court to rescind the provisional disposition which declared this strike as illegal, dated 16 December 2021.

Endorsed by:

  1. 197 Land Community (Koh Kong)
  2. Am Leang Community (Kampong Speu)
  3. Andong Trabek Land Community (Svay Rieng)
  4. Areng Indigenous Community​ (Koh Kong)
  5. Boeung Pram Community (Battambang)
  6. Building and Wood Workers’ Trade Union Federation of Cambodia (BWTUC)
  7. Cambodia Informal Workers’ Association (CIWA)
  8. Cambodian Alliance of Trade Unions (CATU)
  9. Cambodian Center for Human Rights (CCHR)
  10. Cambodian Food and Service Workers’ Federation (CFSWF)
  11. Cambodian Human Rights Action Coalition (CHRAC)
  12. Cambodian Human Rights and Development Association (ADHOC)
  13. Cambodian Independent Civil Servants’ Association (CICA)
  14. Cambodian Informal Employment Reinforcement Association (CIERA)
  15. Cambodian Institute for Democracy (CID)
  16. Cambodian League for the Promotion and Defense of Human Rights (LICADHO)
  17. Cambodian Tourism Workers’ Union Federation (CTWUF)
  18. Cambodian Youth Network (CYN)
  19. Center for Alliance of Labor and Human Rights (CENTRAL)
  20. Charay Indigenous Community (Ratanakiri)
  21. Chi Kha Leu Land Community (Koh Kong)
  22. Coalition of Cambodian Apparel Workers’ Democratic Union (CCAWDU)
  23. Coalition of Cambodian Farmers Community Association (CCFC)
  24. Coalition of Free Trade Unions of Women Textile (CFTUWT)
  25. Committee for Free and Fair Elections in Cambodia (COMFREL)
  26. Community to Protect Nature (Pursat)
  27. Dak Por Community (Kampong Speu)
  28. Equitable Cambodia (EC)
  29. Federation of Free Trade Union of Workers of the Kingdom of Cambodia (FTUWKC)
  30. Free and Independent Trade Union Federation (FUFI)
  31. Independent Democratic of Informal Economy Association (IDEA)
  32. Independent Trade Union Federation (INTUFE)
  33. Indigenous Community in Prame Commune (Preah Vihear)
  34. Khmer Kampuchea Krom for Human Rights and Development Association (KKKHRDA)
  35. Klaing Toek 78 Community (Siem Reap)
  36. Koh Sralao Fishery Community (Koh Kong)
  37. Kouy​ Indigenous​​ Community (Preah Vihear)
  38. Land Community (Pailin)
  39. Ou Damdaek Community (Kampong Thom)
  40. Peace Bridges Organization (PBO)
  41. Phnom Kroam Community (Siem Reap)
  42. Phnom Tnaut Community (Kampot)
  43. Phum Sela Khmer Land Community (Banteay Meanchey)
  44. Prey Chher Pech Changvar Laor Chhert Community (Kampong Chhnang)
  45. Prey Lang Community (Kampong Thom)
  46. Prey Peay Fishery Community (Kampot)
  47. Samaki Chek Meas Community (Svay Rieng)
  48. Samakum Teang Tnaut (STT)
  49. Solidarity House (SH)
  50. Sre Ampel Water Fall Tourism Forestry Community (Kampong Chhnang)
  51. Sre Prang Community (Tboung Khmum)
  52. Steung Khsach Sor Forestry Resource (Kampong Chhnang)
  53. Ta Ni Land Community (Siemreap)
  54. The Cambodia Confederation of Unions (CCU)
  55. Tonlung Community (Tboung Khmum)
  56. Transparency International (TI)
  57. Workers’ Solidarity Strength Independent Union (WSSIU)
  58. Youth Resource Development Program (YRDP)
  59. Klahaan
  60. Gender and Development for Cambodia (GADC)
  61. The Cambodian NGO Committee on CEDAW (NGO-CEDAW)
  62. Chongkom 1 community (Tbong Khmum)
  63. Knorng Kroper Lech community (Tbong Khmum)
  64. Grassroots farmer community (Tbong Khmum)
  65. Yerng Knhom community (Tbong Khmum)
  66. Chongkom Kandal community (Tbong Khmum)
  67. Kompres community (Tbong Khmum)
  68. Tropiang Pring community (Tbong Khmum)
  69. Brolos community (Tbong Khmum)
  70. Broma Robrom community (Kratie)
  71. Sombok community (Kratie)
  72. Women network for Tropiang Pring community (Tbong Khmum)
  73. Romeas Haek rural women network (Svay Rieng)
  74. Chek Meas community network (Svay Rieng)
  75. Women network for Meanchey community (Svay Rieng)
  76. Dok Por women community (Takeo)
  77. Chok Chey women community (Takeo)
  78. Women united for Spean Ches community (Preah Sihanouk)
  79. 843 Women movement alliance (Koh Kong)
  80. Rural youth farmer alliance (Koh Kong)
  81. Preah Vihear youth farmer group (Preah Vihear)
  82. Tombe Meanchey youth network (Tbong Khmum)
  83. Kompong Ompil conservation forest community (Svay Rieng)
  84. Sithprosre community (Prey Veng)
  85. Chong Ompil land community (Prey Veng)
  86. Seang Kveang community (Prey Veng)
  87. Chrey Lerng farmer community (Prey Veng)
  88. Phom Khnom community (Kandal)
  89. Thmar Thom Andoung Tuek Praek Trabek Community (Preah Sihanouk)
  90. Ou Kampuchea Community (Preah Sihanouk)
  91. Kbal Hong Tuek Communtiy (Preah Sihanouk)
  92. Praek Traeng Community (Preah Sihanouk)
  93. Pongrouk Community (Kampot)
  94. Veal Veng Community (Kampot)
  95. Ang Svay Farmer Community (Kampot)
  96. Rural Farmer Land Community (Koh Kong)
  97. 843 Land Community (Koh Kong)
  98. 766 Land Community (Koh Kong)
  99. Nea Pisey Rural Land Community (Koh Kong)
  100. Chambak Trang Farmer Community (Kampong Speu)
  101. Odom Sre Kpos forest land community (Kompong Speu)
  102. Human right promotion land community (Kandal)
  103. Trey Sla community (Kandal)
  104. Totol community (Kandal)
  105. Ompov Prey community (Kandal)
  106. Kotarear community (Takeo)
  107. Samaki community (Takeo)
  108. Phum Kandal Community (Takeo)
  109. Trapeang Krasang Community (Takeo)
  110. Kanlaeng Khla Community (Takeo)
  111. Sambo Community (Preah Vihear)
  112. Russei Srok Community (Preah Vihear)
  113. Chouk Chey Community (Preah Vihear)
  114. Kalorth Community (Preah Vihear)
  115. Ou Romdoul Land Community (Preah Vihear)
  116. Phnom Ke Samaki Community (Preah Vihear)
  117. Bos Community (Preah Vihear)
  118. Tasou Meanrith Community (Preah Vihear)
  119. Trapeang Rolous Community (Prey Veng)

PDF format:  Download full statement in Khmer Download full statement in English

Joint Statement Veng Sreng Remembered: Eight Years of Silence but No Peace

Phnom Penh, 03 January 2022

We, the undersigned civil society groups, stand in solidarity with the families of the victims killed, injured, and disappeared eight years ago today when security forces opened fire on striking workers on Veng Sreng Boulevard in Phnom Penh. We continue to call for accountability for the violence and the disappearance of then-15-year-old Khem Sophath, who remains missing today.

On 3 January 2014, mixed government forces shot and killed at least four people and wounded at least 38 others when shutting down peaceful strikes on Veng Sreng Boulevard. The strikes of garment workers calling for a fair minimum wage were brutal and disproportionate. The eventual investigation into the shooting was reported to last just three weeks and failed to hold anyone accountable for the deaths of Kim Phaleap, Sam Ravy, Yean Rithy and Pheng Kosal. In contrast, 23 workers and human rights defenders were arrested and later convicted in a farcical trial on charges of aggravated intentional violence, aggravated intentional destruction of property, obstruction and insult related to the protests.

Khem Sophath, a 15-year-old child, remains missing to this day. Sophath was last seen lying face down in a pool of his own blood from an apparent gunshot wound to the chest, urging others to save themselves as forces continued to fire on demonstrators. When demonstrators returned to the spot after the gunfire ceased, Sophath was gone. Brigadier General Kheng Tito of the military police confirmed weeks after the incident that Sophath was not among the arrested.

In May 2014, two men found fragments of bones and the remains of burned tires at Brigade 70 military base in Kampong Speu province, leading to speculation that those remains belonged to Khem Sophath. The government denies that the remains were those of Khem Sophath, but has also failed to conduct a thorough, independent, impartial or effective investigation as is required by law. The government has further failed to provide the family with information regarding the investigation’s measures and any developments towards uncovering the truth of what happened to their teenage son.

In Leakena, Sophath’s mother, is left with only questions.  “If he was shot and killed, his body shouldn’t be taken away—then I couldn’t arrange a proper ceremony for him.” She said, “I pray for him every year at home—without his body or knowing whether he is still alive or dead.”  She appealed to all parties to “find justice for my son.”

Cambodia agreed to the International Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance prior to Khem Sophath’s disappearance and is thus obligated to take appropriate measures to locate Sophath, to keep his family informed of the investigation into his disappearance, and to provide “fair and adequate” compensation.

On the anniversary of Khem Sophath’s disappearance, we call on the Royal Government of Cambodia to:

– Assist the family of a disappeared child find peace by taking immediate, concrete measures to investigate Khem Sophath’s disappearance until his fate is determined, including but not limited to identifying and effectively interviewing all armed and security forces present at the site of disappearance.
– Hold the appropriate parties accountable for the disappearance of Khem Sophath and the shooting of Khem Sophath, Kim Phaleap, Sam Ravy, Yean Rithy and Pheng Kosal, and file proper charges for a thorough, independent, impartial and effective prosecution.
– Share progress and results of the investigation to date and going forward with Khem Sophath’s family, including what scientific examinations were conducted to examine the remains found in May 2014 at the Brigade 70 military base and how they were determined to not belong to Khem Sophath.
– Respect and return any identified remains to Khem Sophath’s family and grant them its full support in seeking reparations.

Signed by:

  1. 197 Land Community (Koh Kong)
  2. Am Leang Community (Kampong Speu)
  3. Activities for Environment Community (AEC)
  4. Areng Indigenous Community​ (Koh Kong)
  5. Bos Snor Community (Tbong Khmum)
  6. Boeung Pram Community (Battambang)
  7. Building and Wood Workers Trade Union Federation of Cambodia (BWTUC)
  8. Cambodian Alliance of Trade Unions (CATU)
  9. Cambodian Labor Confederation (CLC)
  10. Cambodian Food and Service Workers’ Federation (CFSWF)
  11. Cambodian Human Rights and Development Association (ADHOC)
  12. Cambodian Center for Human Rights (CCHR)
  13. Cambodia’s Independent Civil Servants Association (CICA)
  14. Cambodian Independent Teachers’ Association (CITA)
  15. Cambodian Informal Economy Workers Association (CIWA-CLC)
  16. Cambodian League for the Promotion and Defense of Human Rights (LICADHO)
  17. Cambodian Tourism Workers Union Federation (CTWUF)
  18. Cambodian Youth Network (CYN)
  19. Center for Alliance of Labor and Human Rights (CENTRAL)
  20. Chi Kha Kraom Land Community (Koh Kong)
  21. Charay Indigenous Community (Ratanakiri)
  22. Coalition for Integrity and Social Accountability (CISA)
  23. Coalition of Cambodian Farmers Community Association (CCFC)
  24. Community Peace-Building Network (CPN)
  25. Community to Protect Nature (Pursat)
  26. Dak Por Community (Kampong Speu)
  27. Equitable Cambodia (EC)
  28. Gender and Development Cambodia (GADC)
  29. Haong Samnam Community (Kampong Speu)
  30. Independent Democracy of Informal Economy Association (IDEA)
  31. Independent Trade Union Federation (INTUFE)
  32. Indigenous Community in Prame Commune (Preah Vihear)
  33. Khmer Kampuchea Krom For Human Rights and Development Association (KKKHRDA)
  34. Koh Sralao Fishery Community (Koh Kong)
  35. Kouy​ Indigenous​​ Community (Preah Vihear)
  36. Labour Right Supported Union Khmer Employee of Nagaworld (L.R.S.U)
  37. Land Community (Pailin)
  38. Lor Peang Land Community (Kampong Chhnang)
  39. Mean Chey Land Community (Svay Rieng)
  40. Ou Damdaek Community (Kampong Thom)
  41. Peace Bridges Organization (PBO)
  42. Peam Ros Community (Kampong Speu)
  43. Phum Sela Khmer Land Community (Banteay Meanchey)
  44. Phnom Tnaut Community (Kampot)
  45. Ponlok Khmer (PKH)
  46. Prey Lang Community (Kampong Thom)
  47. Prey Peay Fishery Community (Kampot)
  48. Prey Chher Pech Changvar Laor Chhert Community (Kampong Chhnang)
  49. Reaksmei Sameakki Community (Kampong Speu)
  50. Sahmakum Teang Tnaut (STT)
  51. Samaki Chek Meas Community (Svay Rieng)
  52. Samaki Sangkae Pir Mean Rith (Preah Vihear)
  53. Sre Ampel Water Fall Tourism Forestry Community
  54. Sre Prang Community (Tboung Khmum)
  55. Ta Ni Land Community (Siem Reap)
  56. Ta Noun Land Community (Koh Kong)
  57. The Cambodian NGO Committee on CEDAW (NGO-CEDAW)
  58. Transparency International Cambodia (TI)
  59. Youth Resources Development Program (YRDP)
    PDF format:  Download full statement in Khmer Download full statement in English

Joint Statement on Strike Action by NagaWorld Employees

18 December 2021

We, as civil society organisations, trade union federations, confederations and associations working to promote and protect labour and human rights in Cambodia express our firm solidarity with striking employees at NagaWorld Limited who are currently exercising their fundamental rights to peacefully strike according to the Labour Law, the Law on Trade Unions and their statutes previously registered with the Ministry of Labour and Vocational Training. We are extremely disappointed with the provisional disposition issued by the Phnom Penh Court of First Instance on 16 December 2021 which declared this strike to be illegal and call on NagaWorld to engage with its employees and their representatives directly and in good faith to resolve this dispute.

On 18 December 2021, more than 1,300 employees of NagaWorld Limited, including members of the Labour Rights Supported Union of Khmer Employees of NagaWorld (LRSU) began strike action to demand reinstatement of 365 employees previously dismissed as part of a mass force layoff 1,329 workers in late April 2021. Amongst those dismissed include the entirety of the local LRSU leadership, including Union President Chhim Sithar, as well as elected shop stewards. Shortly after the strike began, representatives from the Phnom Penh Court of First Instance read out a provisional disposition issued by the Phnom Penh Court of First Instance on 16 December 2021 which declared the strike to be illegal and ordered striking workers to return to work. According to the order, those workers who do not return to work will be considered to have committed serious misconduct, paving the way for NagaWorld to terminate their employment. LRSU was not given notice of the court’s decision until approximately 9:30 AM on December 18, 2021. The provisional disposition was issued with LRSU being provided no opportunity to contest or respond to Naga World’s request to prohibit the strike prior to the decision being made. Paragraph 4 of Section 548 of the Code of Civil Procedure requires the court to hold a court date for either oral arguments or questioning prior to issuing a provisional disposition. In circumstances where the court has issued a provisional disposition before the strike had even occurred, it ought to have summoned LRSU for either oral arguments or questioning before making its decision.

Also on the afternoon of 18 December, the Phnom Penh Administration issued a letter to a number of LRSU leaders, instructing them to cease their “demonstration” as it did not comply with Article 5 of the Law on Peaceful Demonstrations. However, Point 3-1-2 of Section I of the Implementation Guide to the Law on Peaceful Demonstrations, issued by the Ministry of Interior through Decision No. 2337/10 states clearly that the Law on Peaceful Demonstrations does not apply to labour disputes which take place outside or adjacent to an enterprise. As such, the Phnom Penh Administration should not attempt to dissolve a strike by referring to a law which is not applicable for this case.

The strike at NagaWorld has occurred after consistent refusals by management to engage in genuine or good faith negotiation with LRSU and failures by the Ministry of Labour and Vocational Training and Phnom Penh City Hall to secure resolution. The right to collective bargaining and the right to strike are guaranteed to Cambodian workers both by virtue of the Cambodian Constitution, as well as International Labour Organisation (ILO) conventions nos. 87 and 98, both of which have been ratified by the Kingdom of Cambodia. The Constitutional Council of Cambodia has previously ruled that international treaties ratified and recognised by Cambodia form part of Cambodian domestic law.

We recall that in January 2020, NagaWorld employees conducted strike action demanding pay increases as well as the reinstatement of LRSU President Chhim Sithar. At the time, NagaWorld responded by similarly requesting the Phnom Penh Court of First Instance declare the strike as illegal and order employees to return to work. As civil society organisations, trade unions and associations working to protect and promote labour and human rights in Cambodia, we see Naga World’s response to both the January 2020 and present strike as little more than a blatant attempt to silence the collective voice of LRSU members and NagaWorld employees more broadly. The Phnom Penh Court of First Instance should not have accepted Naga​​ World’s request for provisional disposition and its decision to issue such an order severely undermines the fundamental rights and freedoms guaranteed to NagaWorld employees by the Cambodian Constitution. The ILO has as recently as this year called on the Cambodian Government to take necessary measures to guarantee the lawful and peaceful exercise of the right to strike.

We hope that LRSU members and NagaWorld employees will not be cowed into silence through these forms of legal action and intimidation. The only way to resolve this dispute is for the company to immediately engage in genuine and good faith negotiations with NagaWorld workers and their representatives to find a mutually acceptable solution. The legal system must not be used as a tool by which to silence workers’ voices. We appeal to NagaWorld, the Ministry of Labour and Vocational Training and all relevant local authorities to immediately make all necessary efforts to peacefully resolve this dispute.

This statement is supported by:

  1. 197 Land Community (Koh Kong)
  2. Andong Trabek Land Community (Svay Rieng)
  3. Areng Indigenous Community (Koh Kong)
  4. Boeung Pram Community (Battambang)
  5. Bos Snor Community (Tbong Khmum)
  6. Building and Wood Workers’ Trade Union Federation of Cambodia (BWTUC)
  7. Cambodia Informal Workers’ Association (CIWA)
  8. Cambodian Alliance of Trade Unions (CATU)
  9. Cambodian Center for Human Rights (CCHR)
  10. Cambodian Food and Service Workers’ Federation (CFSWF)
  11. Cambodian Human Rights Action Coalition (CHRAC)
  12. Cambodian Human Rights and Development Association (ADHOC)
  13. Cambodian Independent Civil Servants’ Association (CICA)
  14. Cambodian Informal Employment Reinforcement Association (CIERA)
  15. Cambodian League for the Promotion and Defence of Human Rights (LICADHO)
  16. Cambodian Tourism Workers’ Union Federation (CTWUF)
  17. Cambodian Youth Network (CYN)
  18. Center for Alliance of Labor and Human Rights (CENTRAL)
  19. Charay Indigenous Community (Ratanakiri)
  20. Chi Kha Kraom Land Community (Koh Kong)
  21. Chi Kha Leu Land Community (Koh Kong)
  22. Coalition of Cambodian Apparel Workers’ Democratic Union (CCAWDU)
  23. Coalition of Cambodian Farmers Community Association (CCFC)
  24. Coalition of Free Trade Unions of Women Textile (CFTUWT)
  25. Committee for Free and Fair Elections in Cambodia (COMFREL)
  26. Community to Protect Nature (Pursat)
  27. Dak Por Community (Kampong Speu)
  28. Free and Independent Trade Union Federation (FUFI)
  29. Free Trade Union of Workers of the Kingdom of Cambodia (FTUWKC)
  30. Haong Samnam Community (Kampong Speu)
  31. Independent Democratic of Informal Economy Association (IDEA)
  32. Independent Trade Union Federation (INTUFE)
  33. Indigenous Community in Prame Commune (Preah Vihear)
  34. Klaing Toek 78 Community (Siem Reap)
  35. Koh Sralao Fishery Community (Koh Kong)
  36. Kouy Indigenous Community (Preah Vihear)
  37. Land Community (Pailin)
  38. Lor Peang Community (Kampong Chhnang)
  39. Ou Chamsrey Tradakpong Community (Kampong Thom)
  40. Ou Damdaek Community (Kampong Thom)
  41. Ou Vor Preng Community (Battambang)
  42. Peam Ros Community (Kampong Speu)
  43. Phnom Tnaut Community (Kampot)
  44. Prey Chher Pech Changvar Laor Chhert Community (Kampong Chhnang)
  45. Prey Lang Community (Kampong Thom)
  46. Prey Peay Land Community (Kampot)
  47. Samaki Sangkae Pir Mean Rith (Preah Vihear)
  48. Samakum Teang Tnaut (STT)
  49. Solidarity House (SH)
  50. Sre Ampel Water Fall Tourism Forestry Community (Kampong Chhnang)
  51. Sre Prang Community (Tboung Khmum)
  52. Steung Khsach Sor Forestry Resource (Kampong Chhnang)
  53. Ta Ni Land Community (Siem Reap)
  54. Ta Noun Land Community (Koh Kong)
  55. Thmar Da Community (Pursat)
  56. Tonlung Community (Tboung Khmum)
  57. Workers’ Solidarity Strength Independent Union (WSSIU)
  58. Youth Resource Development Program (YRDP)
  59. Equitable Cambodia (EC)
    PDF format:  Download full statement in Khmer Download full statement in English

Facts and Figures #45 Urban Poor Women’s Stories COVID-19 Edition

Urban poor women often lead the way towards the realization of land and housing rights for their communities. However, they face many challenges largely because they are women, a situation which has been exacerbated due to the COVID-19 pandemic. This research is a continuation of the 2019 Urban Poor Women’s Stories and aims to assess the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on women living in urban poor communities. Interviews were conducted with twelve women, from eight urban poor communities in Phnom Penh, facing the threat of eviction.

This report illustrates that urban poor women have faced intensified effects as a result of COVID-19, largely due to their status as women. Traditional gender roles effectively confine women to their respective homes and communities, exposing them not only to a greater risk of contracting the virus, but also to various challenges which affect their mental health. As urban poor women are primarily responsible for the everyday needs of the household, COVID-19 has increased the burden on them, and amplified their vulnerabilities. Majority of the respondents have had significant impacts on their physical and mental health as a result of food insecurity, inadequate living conditions and loss of income, which have further exacerbated their existing fears on their land tenure insecurity.

In order to build back better from the socio-economic consequences which have resulted from the COVID-19 pandemic in Cambodia, social protection mechanisms and land titling should be prioritized in order to ensure the most vulnerable and marginalized populations in society are not further impoverished.

 

Noted: For those who would like a hard copy of this report, please register using the link. https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1wCYA8_rJyXHbmalw2UhAouBRbeKrFUuqEBoaAlqbvMo/viewform?edit_requested=true

You can download the reports as PDF files here! KhmerEnglish
STT will prepare it for you. Thanks!

Joint Statement on Severe Violations of the Labour Rights and Basic Freedoms of the Trade Union at NagaWorld Limited

We, as representatives of trade union confederations, federations, associations and civil society organisations working to promote human rights and labour rights in the Kingdom of Cambodia are extremely disappointed with the intention and attempts to dissolve the union leadership structure and the unreasonable and unacceptable planned systematic reduction of staff during the COVID-19 crisis at NagaWorld Limited.

The recent notice of dismissal of trade union leaders and activists clearly shows NagaWorld’s intention to severely violate the basic rights and freedoms of professional organisations (trade unions) stated in the core conventions of the International Labour Organisation (ILO). Article 1 of Convention No. 98 on the Right to Organise and Collective Bargaining states: “Workers shall enjoy adequate protection against acts of anti-union discrimination in respect of their employment,” including compulsion to not join or to resign from a union, dismissal from employment or other forms of harm. Article 2 states: “Workers’ and employers’ organisations shall enjoy adequate protection against any acts of interference by each other or each other’s agents or members in their establishment, functioning or administration.” In particular, all actions taken to aid workers’ organisations which fall under the compulsion of the employer or employers’ organisations or which provide support by monetary means or other means to place workers’ organisations under the influence of employers or employers’ organisations are considered as acts of interference. Instead, the Ministry of Labour and Vocational Training has agreed to the company’s request to dismiss them. Meanwhile, the company pushed those terminated leaders and activists to ask ministerial officials themselves when the union demanded to view the letter authorizing dismissal of trade union leaders who otherwise have this special protection.

On 8 April 2021, representatives of NagaWorld Limited announced a planned layoff of 1,329 staff members out of its total of more than 8,000 staff due to the COVID-19 crisis. At the end of April, company representatives confirmed that the company would directly contact each staff listed for layoff, as well as summoning them for a meeting on company premises.

Through the union, a majority of employees objected to this planned layoff and did not accept the reasoning raised by the company as the company had not faced any business losses, having made a net profit of more than US$102 million in 2020. According to NagaWorld’s own financial reports, in the first two months of 2021 alone the company made a net profit of more than US$172 million whilst staff had their working hours reduced by up to 60% in order to reduce company expenses and received wages only according to their actual number of days worked.

For this planned mass layoff, the company did not discuss the procedures of preparation according to Article 95 of the Labour Law or present the categories of employees which would be affected by this layoff. Instead, when notifying employees, the layoff only affected those workers with long employment seniority, especially those who are union leaders, shop stewards, union activists and union members, with more than 1,100 of the 1,329 workers (equivalent to 82%) to be laid off being union members.

The majority of workers who received notice of dismissal from the company felt forced to resign from employment and did not dare to continue protesting with the company even though they knew they were victims of injustice. The company provided severance packages not in line with the Labour Law. Of the 1,329 workers, 373 objected and refused to take these severance packages, demanding the company apply the Labour Law and reinstate them to their previous employment.

After multiple negotiations without resolution, worker decided to complain to the Ministry of Labour and Vocational Training in June and continued negotiations to the Arbitration Council at the start of July 2021. Arbitration Council Award No. 12/21 issued on 10 September 2021 did not consider the demands of 373 workers to be reinstated with the Arbitration Council seemingly referring to the reasoning of the company and not the Labour Law which states that the role of the Arbitration Council is to resolve all disputes forwarded to it by the Ministry of Labour. The Arbitration Council pushed procedures back to the Labour Inspector, claiming that the workers’ demands for reinstatement currently fell under his consideration.

On 23 September 2021, the union sent a letter requesting the Department of Labour Inspections order NagaWorld to reinstate the 373 workers after NagaWorld submitted a request to dismiss workers to the Department of Labour Inspections on 6 August 2021 which was not legally valid.

On 23 September 2021, the union sent a letter to NagaWorld requesting preparation of work shifts for these 373 workers as for other workers.

On 18 October 2021, the union sent a letter to His Excellency the Minister of Labour and Vocational Training requesting a meeting to report about the dispute and non-implementation of the Labour Law at NagaWorld after failing to receive a reply from the Labour Inspector. However, the Minister has also not responded to the union’s request either.

The union has tried to find a peaceful resolution with the company, but the company has ignored the union’s requests to meet. Instead, the company has only tried to lobby workers present at the workplace to organise a group to discuss various issues with them which shows the company’s intention to discriminate the union and does not have a spirit to promote professional relations in the company with the union.

On 5 November 2021, Human Resources staff of the company issued a notice terminating the contracts of union leaders and shop stewards.

The suffering and injustice suffered by workers at NagaWorld is a reflection of law enforcement in Cambodia and is a bad example for other employers to follow the experience of NagaWorld. We, as representatives of trade union confederations, federations, associations and civil society organisations working to promote human rights and labour rights in the Kingdom of Cambodia will continue to attentively monitor this case and call on the Ministry of Labour and Vocational Training to review the request to dismiss employees which was not implemented properly according to the Labour Law and conduct proper labour inspections based on legal principles to strengthen the rule of law in Cambodia. Moreover, the neglect of legal enforcement by this enormous company will be a bad example for other investors to emulate, causing more workers to suffer injustice, as well as tarnishing the Royal Government’s image internationally.

We request the Royal Government inspect and intervene to provide an acceptable resolution to this case. We also call on NagaWorld management to negotiate in good faith with union representatives to find a resolution acceptable to both sides and form good professional relations with the union at the workplace. In particular, we call for the reinstatement of these 373 employees and an end to all discrimination and oppression against the union.

 Phnom Penh , 01   December  2021             

This statement is supported by:

1.     Cambodian Youth Network (CYN)

2.    Cambodian Alliance of Trade Unions (CATU)

3.    Independent Trade Union Federation (INTUFE)

4.    Coalition of Cambodian Farmer Community​​ (CCFC)

5.    Cambodian Food and Service Workers Federation (CFSWF)

6.    Building and Wood Workers Trade Union Federation of Cambodia (BWTUC)

7.    Independent Democracy of Informal Economy Association (IDEA)

8.    Cambodian Tourism Workers Union Federation (CTWUF)

9.    Free Trade Union of Workers of the Kingdom of Cambodia (FTUWKC)

10.  Free Independent Trade Union Federation (FUFI)

11.  Coalition of Cambodian Apparel Workers Democratic Unions (C.CAWDU)

12.  Cambodia Informal Workers Association (CIWA)

  1. Coalition Free Trade Union of the Women Textile (CFTUWT)

14.  Workers’ Solidarity Strength Independent Union (WSSIU)

15.  Solidarity House (SH)

16.  Cambodia’s Independent Public Servant Association (CICA)

17.  Cambodia Informal Employment Reinforcement Association (CIERA)

18.  Cambodian League for the Promotion and Defense of Human Rights (LICADHO)

19.  Center for Alliance of Labor and Human Rights (CENTRAL)

20.  Cambodian Human Rights and Development Association (ADHOC)

21.  Committee for Free and Fair Election in Cambodia (COMFREL)

22.  Cambodian Center for Human Rights (CCHR)

23.  Sahmakum Teang Tnaut (STT)
24.  Cambodia Human Rights Action Coalition (CHRAC)

25.  Youth Resource Development Program (YRDP)

 

Statement: More reforms needed beyond conditional releases of activists

November 24, 2021 – We the undersigned civil society groups welcome the release of more than 27 wrongfully imprisoned and unjustly convicted activists from prison in recent days and celebrate the fact that they are reunited with their families. However, many of these activists continue to face criminal charges or remain under judicial supervision with onerous conditions as a result of exercising their rights to freedom of expression, association, and peaceful assembly. No action has been taken to reform the laws and systems that led to their persecution and which have destroyed the space for activism and political participation in Cambodia.

Considering that many of the activists have been released on bail or remain subject to probation for several years following a suspended sentence, they are no longer able to undertake their work to defend human rights or the environment, speak out against injustices, or participate in political life without fear of arrest. Such releases also do not remedy the fact that the activists were wrongfully convicted and that many were detained for over one year in overcrowded prisons that one activist described as “hell”.

In addition, more than 60 other people, including journalists, political activists, social media users, and more than a dozen land rights activists, remain in prison over their work and activism. Charges of incitement and plotting are still regularly levelled against anyone who dares to speak out or criticise the government, and the normalisation of this repression and increasing self-censorship is a growing threat.

These releases are not substitutes for fundamental reforms to Cambodia’s laws and institutions. Cambodians face ongoing restrictions to the right to participate freely in politics and choose their leaders. The Cambodia National Rescue Party (CNRP) remains dissolved; other parties are denied the right to be formed; and all parties are subject to the decisions of the partial judiciary and the Ministry of Interior, which hold ultimate decision power over whether they can compete in upcoming elections.

Human rights in the country remain under constant threat by a politicised judiciary and repressive laws and decrees. Problematic legislative instruments include recent amendments to the Constitution, Law on Political Parties and election laws, as well as the Trade Union Law, the law governing NGOs and associations, the Covid-19 law, the Law on Telecommunications, and the establishment of a new National Internet Gateway. These amendments and laws must be repealed to restore Cambodia’s civic and political space.

While we celebrate these activists’ release, we also are reminded that their conditional release does not fix the structural injustices that they spoke out against prior to their arrest and that they and others remain under threat. We call on the government to take structural steps to restore democracy and civic space in the country, and to restore the fundamental rights of all Cambodians prior to the next elections. We further call on the government to release all political prisoners and activists persecuted for exercising their
fundamental rights; to overturn existing wrongful convictions; and to drop all charges, probationary requirements and judicial supervision for these released activists.

Joined by:
1. 197 Land Community (Koh Kong)
2. Am Leang Community (Kampong Speu)
3. Alliance for Conflict Transformation (ACT)
4. Activities for Environment Community (AEC)
5. Areng Indigenous Community
6. Boeung Pram Community (Battambang)
7. Building Community Voices (BCV)
8. Buddhism for Peace Organization (BPO)
9. Cambodian Alliance of Trade Unions (CATU)
10. Cambodian Labor Confederation (CLC)
11. Cambodian Food and Service Workers’ Federation (CFSWF)
12. Cambodian Human Rights and Development Association (ADHOC)
13. Cambodian Center for Human Rights (CCHR)
14. Cambodian Human Rights Action Coalition (CHRAC)
15. Cambodia’s Independent Civil Servants Association (CICA)
16. Cambodian Independent Teachers’ Association (CITA)
17. Cambodian Institute for Democracy (CID)
18. Cambodian League for the Promotion and Defense of Human Rights (LICADHO)
19. Cambodian Tourism Workers Union Federation (CTWUF)
20. Cambodian Youth Network (CYN)
21. Center for Alliance of Labor and Human Rights (CENTRAL)
22. Chi Kha Kraom Land Community (Koh Kong)
23. Chi Kha Leu Land Community (Koh Kong)
24. Charay Indigenous Community (Ratanakiri)
25. Choam Kravien Community (Tboung Khmum)
26. Coalition for Integrity and Social Accountability (CISA)
27. Coalition of Cambodian Farmers Community Association (CCFC)
28. Committee for Free and Fair Elections in Cambodia (COMFREL)
29. Community Peace-Building Network (CPN)
30. Community to Protect Nature (Pursat)
31. Dak Por Community (Kampong Speu)
32. Equitable Cambodia (EC)
33. Gender and Development Cambodia (GADC)
34. Independent Democracy of Informal Economy Association (IDEA)
35. Independent Monk Network for Social Justice (IMNSJ)
36. Khmer Kampuchea Krom For Human Rights and Development Association (KKKHRDA)
37. Kouy Indigenous Community (Preah Vihear)
38. Kleang Toek 78 Community (Siemreap)
39. Koh Sralao Fishery Community (Koh Kong)
40. Labour Right Supported Union Khmer Employee of Nagaworld (L.R.S.U)
41. Land Community (Pailin)
42. Lor Peang Land Community (Kampong Chhnang)
43. Mean Chey Land Community (Svay Rieng)
44. Peace Bridges Organization (PBO)
45. People Center for Development and Peace (PDP-Center)
46. Phum Sela Khmer Land Community (Banteay Meanchey)
47. Ponlok Khmer (PKH)
48. Prek Ksach Land Community (Koh Kong)
49. Prey Peay Fishery Community (Kampot)
50. Prey Chher Pech Changvar Laor Chhert Community (Kampong Chhnang)
51. Prey Lang Community (Kampong Thom)
52. Rattanak Rokha Forestry Community (Oddar Meanchey)
53. Sahmakum Teang Tnaut (STT)
54. Samaki Chek Meas Community (Svay Rieng)
55. Samaki Romeas Haek Community (Svay Rieng)
56. Samaki Sangkae Pir Mean Rith (Preah Vihear)
57. Sre Ampel Water Fall Tourism Forestry Community (Kampong Chhnang)
58. Sre Prang Community (Tboung Khmum)
59. Steung Khsach Sor Forestry Resource (Kampong Chhnang)
60. Ta Ni Land Community (Siemreap)
61. Ta Noun Land Community (Koh Kong)
62. The Cambodian NGO Committee on CEDAW (NGO-CEDAW)
63. Tonlung Community (Tboung Khmum)
64. Trapeang Chour Community (Kampong Speu)
65. Transparency International Cambodia (TIC)
66. Youth Resources Development Program (YRDP)

PDF format:  Download full statement in Khmer Download full statement in English

On a background of wooden blocks, a white pen, white paper clips and a white card with the text WE ARE HIRING. View from above

JOB ANNOUNCEMENT: Program Advisor

Sahmakum Teang Tnaut (STT) is a non-governmental organization, non-profitable, was set up in September 2005 and officially registered with the ministry of interior in December 2006. STT tries to reflect in its work with urban communities. From the outset, STT has had a focus on infrastructure upgrading, but over the past decade, many communities have been impacted by development relating to land alienation and evictions. Because of this, STT has strengthened its research and advocacy to draw attention to a development policy that in Phnom Penh alone has led to 270,000 residents being displaced since 1990. By supporting genuine community complaints and grievances, STT and its partners have been helping communities articulate their concerns to local and international Media, donors and other NGOs and INGOs.

To support our projects, STT is looking for qualified candidates to fill the roles of Program Advisor.

Program Advisor

Unit                       : Program
Reporting to           : Executive Director
Hiring                    : 1 Position
Starting Date          : as soon as possible
Schedule               : Full Time (Monday-Friday)
Gross Salary          : Negotiable 

Main responsibilities, Tasks and Activities:
  1. Strategic Planning:
    – To work with the Executive Director, Programme Manager and MC to ensure programs and operations are aligned and representative of the vision and direction of STT.
    – To support and work with MC colleagues in ensuring that STT operates efficiently and effectively, with clear goals, policies and a productive working atmosphere.
  1. Non-voting advisor to the Management Committee (MC):
    – Without having the right to vote on decisions by the MC, the advisor attends MC meetings and provides inputs and suggestions on the development and direction of program management and organizational management.
    – The advisor also assists the ED in preparing reports to the Board of Directors, and planning the objective and agenda of the annual staff retreat; and planning and preparation of STT’s Annual General Meeting (AGM).
  1. Proposal Writing & Reporting to Donors:
    – Compile funding applications in close collaboration with Program Managers, work with the Finance Manager to develop proposal budgets and submit to the ED.
    – Support and collaborate with the ED and Program Managers to manage donor and partner relations (such as through meetings; preparing reports and policy briefs; organize or coordinate community and site visits for donors and partners; email communication on matters pertaining to grants, reports and program implementation).
    – Compile all reports from Program Managers and submit them to the ED, and assist the ED in finalizing reports to donors.
    – Support the monitoring and evaluation process led by the Program Managers.
  1. Support Research
    – In cooperation with senior management, the Advisor will support the research team and the Advocacy and Research Advisor to prepare research papers and advocacy materials and improve overall research and advocacy strategies for the organization.
  1. Project Support:
    – Provide strategic advice and support to teams of the Program during the planning and implementation stages of different projects.
    – Support Project Managers with recruiting, monitor and engaging consultants for project implementation.
  1. Capacity development:
    – Identify potential external training for Program Managers, ED and staff, and provide mentoring support in implementing training material.
    – Work with the MC to monitor, manage and update STT’s annual Staff Capacity Development Plan.
  1. Other duties: May be required to work on other projects with STT as agreed within the MC or as directed by the ED, which might include preparing reports to specific donors, performing administrative duties and participating in meetings as needed, assisting the ED in developing, implementing, evaluating and improving program activities, and provide writing, editing and strategy assistance, as needed, for technical, advocacy and communication matters

Required Qualification:

– Minimum of Bachelor Degree in a relevant field;
– Minimum 4 years of experience in research;
– Proven ability to engage with a broad variety of stakeholders and in coalition with others; openness and curiosity about new approaches and different points of view;
– Experience working in an NGO setting;
– Solid understanding of the Cambodian country context, urban issues and land & housing rights;
– Knowledge and experience of land and housing rights, evidence-based advocacy in urban settings;
– Experience in conducting risk assessments;
– Competence in sample survey techniques;
– Excellent analytical and report writing skills;
– Experience working with media and communications;
– Good people and communication skills;
– Must be a self-starter and be able to work independently with excellent demonstrated teamwork, coordination, and facilitation skills;
– Experience in leading multi-disciplinary teams to deliver quality products in high-stress and short deadline situations.

Skills:

– Strong leadership and planning skills;
– Excellent writing and presentation skills (English);
– Strong communication skills;
– Ability to work in a team environment and to deliver under pressure/meet deadlines;
– Ability to work in strenuous and at times stressful environments and to think critically to mitigate risks
– Ability to network with partners on various levels;
– Comfortable with the necessary computer skills i.e. MS Word (personal laptop will be necessary for this mission);

How to Apply:

Interested candidates are invited to submit their applications together with curriculum vitae and relevant supporting documents to STT’s recruitment committee through email: recruitment@teangtnaut.org.

Closing date:  30th November 2021, at 5 pm.

Only shortlisted candidates will be notified.  Women and person with disabilities are encouraged to apply.

You can download the PDF files here! English

Joint statement on Urban and rural communities call for inclusive development

We, Phnom Penh communities, have faced eviction and relocation as a result of the rapid growth of private and foreign investment. We, rural land communities, have similarly faced eviction as a result of unfair and unjust development projects, often implemented by both foreign and local investors.

Urban and rural development must be conducted in accordance with Cambodia’s laws, with fairness and equity, in order to create a foundation for true sustainable development.

Following our evictions, we have faced growing debts from microfinance institutions and banks; lost livelihoods; physical injuries; a lack of access to healthcare and education; and many other problems. These are the direct result of our unjust and unfair eviction and relocation. Land and housing are life, and without them our lives have suffered.

Eviction is a scary experience. Forced evictions are frightening, and authorities do not respect our human rights when the remove us from our land and our homes.

We have been removed from our homes and lost our land for a variety of reasons. Sometimes it was for city beautification, or improving order, or for increased security in society. But our forced relocations led us to resettle in areas that lacked public services and basic infrastructure, and moved us far from our livelihoods and workplaces. This has caused us to fall further into poverty and debt.

Even during the COVID-19 pandemic, communities in Phnom Penh and in the countryside have been pushed from their land, and are forced to deal with the issues of relocation while also struggling with the pandemic.

Authorities rarely consulted us first, and most times we were threatened and forced to relocate without prior consultation and compensation. We are wronged by local authorities, and we often turn to national institutions or the prime minister to resolve our conflicts. All we want is to have urban and rural development that is transparent, participatory, and prioritises equality and justice. We deserve this, as humans and Cambodian citizens.

 

On World Habitat Day 2021, we call on the government to:

– Promptly solve land and housing conflicts.
– Respect our right to life with dignity, and protect our land and housing rights.
– Stop the use of forced evictions, violence, and judicial harassment to threaten community members and land and housing rights activists.
– Conduct transparent and inclusive environmental and social impact assessments and pro-actively consult with affected communities before processing the development projects.
– Effectively implement housing policies focusing on upgrading existing poor community resettlements, rather than involuntary relocation.

 

Community Names:

  1. Phlov Roth Phleung Community
  2. 92 Community
  3. Rolos Cheung Ek Community
  4. Cheung Ek Group 3 Community
  5. Cheung Ek Group 4 Community
  6. Stoeung Meanchey Community
  7. Borie Kila Community
  8. Boeung Chhouk A Community
  9. Mithapheap Community
  10. Chroy Chongva Community
  11. Samroung Tboung Community
  12. Boeung Chhouk Community
  13. Boeung Trabek Phum 4 Community
  14. Phum 23 Community
  15. Toul Sangke A Community
  16. Trapeang Raingthmey Community
  17. Sen Reakreay Community
  18. Samroung Meanchey Community
  19. Borey Mithapheap Community
  20. Russey Srah Community
  21. Samaki Roung Roeung Community
  22. Prek Takong 60 M Community
  23. Prek Takong 3 Community
  24. Smor San Community
  25. Borey Doeum Sral Community
  26. Satrey Khlang Sang Community
  27. Niroth Boeung Chhouk Community
  28. Boeung Chhouk Meanchey Thmey II
  29. Stoeung Kombot Community
  30. Veal Sbov Community
  31. Satrey Khlahan Community
  32. Prek Takong Roung Roeung Community
  33. Lor Peang Community (Kompong Chhnang)
  34. Samaki Romeas Hek Community (Svay Rieng)
  35. Meanchey Community (Svay Rieng)
  36. Equitable Cambodia (EC)
  37. Urban Poor Women Development (UPWD)
  38. Cambodian Leagues for the Pormotion and Defense of Human Rights (LICADHO)
  39. Sahmakum Teang Tnaut (STT)

PDF format:  Download full statement in Khmer Download full statement in English

 

Living Condition of Non-Standard Forms of Employment Workers

COVID-19 has badly affected people’s health and economies around the world. In Phnom Penh, Non-Standard Forms of Employment Workers (NSEWs) are some of the worst affected. STT’s latest report shows that more than 70% of NSEWs lost more than half their income. However, the government has established a cash funding program which is helping people during COVID-19. But, the government should continue to provide support and to expand the support to reach more NSEWs to ensure everyone in need of support, receives relief from the effects of COVID-19.

 

 

 

You can find more information through www.teangtnaut.org

Note: For those who want to have a hard copy of this report, you can register using the link https://forms.gle/t5haVV96W7giW5me9. STT will prepare it for you.

You can download the reports as PDF files here! Khmer – English

JOINT STATEMENT: Redress Cambodia’s human rights situation before establishing an NHRI

24 August 2021, Phnom Penh – In light of the ever-worsening human rights situation in Cambodia, we, the undersigned civil society organizations, trade unions, associations and communities, are deeply concerned about the Royal Government of Cambodia (“RGC”)’s recent move towards the establishment of a National Human Rights Institution (“NHRI”). While such an institution is direly needed in the Kingdom, the environment in which it would come to operate raises concern as to its expected effectivity and credibility. We urge the RGC to prioritize redressing Cambodia’s human rights situation prior to its establishment to ensure that its creation is motivated by a genuine interest in promoting and protecting human rights rather than by attempts to provide a veneer of credibility to the RGC’s proclaimed commitment to human rights.

When establishing an NHRI, due consideration must be given to the Paris Principles – the international minimum standards for NHRIs to be considered credible and able to operate effectively. Of paramount importance is the requirement of independence from governments. Unfortunately, all the institutions previously set up to be independent from the RGC have ended up being inactive or fully controlled by it, making us fear that the NHRI will know no different fate.

The current human rights environment that prevails in Cambodia adds to concerns that an NHRI established now would ultimately fail to meet its goal of protecting and promoting human rights. As in previous years, 2021 continues to witness the deterioration of the human rights situation, exacerbated by the COVID-19 global pandemic. Fundamental freedoms remain unrelentingly curtailed by the RGC. Civic space continues to shrink by the day, with national authorities regularly using an array of repressive tactics to suppress any critical voices, including the weaponization of the subservient judiciary to harass human rights defenders, opposition members, independent journalists, and other dissidents. In addition, the enactment of repressive laws and the amendments to existing laws illustrate the RGC’s tendency to prioritize the consolidation of its power over the interests and human rights of its citizens.

We recognize that an NHRI is needed in Cambodia to investigate human rights abuses. However, considering all of the above, we do not trust that the NHRI that the RGC intends to create will be independent, effective and credible. Rather, we are worried that in the current context, the establishment of a NHRI is a mere public relations exercise, destined to placate international criticism and condemnation of the RGC’s track-record on human rights.

Before moving forward with the establishment of an NHRI, we urge the RGC to restore human rights in Cambodia and create an environment conducive to its proper functioning and independence. In particular, we call on the RGC to reopen the civic space and ensure that fundamental freedoms are exercised freely by all, including dissenting voices; to immediately and unconditionally release all jailed prisoners of conscience and establish a truly independent judiciary; to repeal or amend all repressive laws to align them with international human rights standards; to cease the ongoing crackdown on human rights defenders, trade unions leaders, opposition members, independent journalists, and other critical voices; and to ensure an open, free and competitive political space ahead of upcoming elections.

This statement is endorsed by:

1 197 Land Community
2 Alliance for Conflict Transformation (ACT)
3 Am Leang Community (Kampong Speu)
4 Andong Trabek Land Community (Svay Rieng)
5 Boeung Pram Community (Battambang)
6 Building and Wood Workers Trade Union Federation of Cambodia (BWTUC)
7 Building Community Voice (BCV)
8 Cambodia Informal Economy Reinforced Association (CIARA)
9 Cambodia’s Independent Civil Servants Association (CICA)
10 Cambodian Alliance of Trade Unions (CATU)
11 Cambodian Center for Human Rights (CCHR)
12 Cambodian Center for Independent Media (CCIM)
13 Cambodian Food and Service Workers Federation (CFSWF)
14 Cambodian Human Rights and Development Association (ADHOC)
15 Cambodian Independent Teacher Association (CITA)
16 Cambodian Informal Economy Workers Association (CIWA)
17 Cambodian Informal Economy Workers Association (CIWA)
18 Cambodian Institute for Democracy (CID)
19 Cambodian Journalists Alliance Association (CamboJA)
20 Cambodian League for the Promotion and Defense of Human Rights (LICADHO)
21 Cambodian Tourism Workers Union Federation (CTWUF)
22 Cambodian Youth Network Associatoin (CYN)
23 Cambodia’s Independent Civil Servants Association (CICA)
24 Center for Alliance of Labor and Human Rights (CENTRAL)
25 Chi Kha Kraom Land Community​ (Koh Kong)
26 Chi Kha Leu Land Community (Koh Kong)
27 Choam Kravien Community (Tboung Khmum)
28 Coalition for Integrity and Social Accountability (CISA)
29 Coalition of Cambodian Farmer Community (CCFC)
30 Coalition of Integrity and Social Accountability (CISA)
31 Committee for Free and Fair Elections (COMFREL)
32 Community Legal Education Center (CLEC)
33 Community to Protect Nature (Pursat)
34 Confederation of Cambodian Workers-Movement (CCW)
35 Dak Por Community (Kampong Speu)
36 Federation of Free Trade Union of Workers of the Kingdom of Cambodia (FTUWKC)
37 Free Independent Trade Union Federation (FUFI)
38 Independent Democracy of Informal Economy Association (IDEA)
39 Independent Trade Union Federation (INTUFEE)
40 Klaing Toek 78 Community (Siemreap)
41 Koh Sralao Fishery Community (Koh Kong)
42 Kouy Indigenous Community (Preah Vihear)
43 Labour Rights Supported Union Khmer Employees of Naga (L.R.S.U)
44 Land Community (Pailin)
45 Lorpeang Community (Kampong Chhnang)
46 Ou Vor Preng Community (Battambang)
47 Peam Ros Community (Kampong Speu)
48 People Center for Development and Peace (PDP-CENTER)
49 Phnom Krom Community (Siem Reap)
50 Ponlok Khmer (PKH)
51 Prey Lang Community (Stung Treng)
52 Prey Peay Land Community (Kampot)
53 Reaksmei Sameakki Community (Kampong Speu)
54 Sahmakum Teang Tnaut (STT)
55 Solidary House Confederation (SHC)
56 Sre Prang Community (Tboung Khmum)
57 Ta Noun Land Community (Koh Kong)
58 The Affiliated Network for Social Accountability (ANSA) Cambodia
59 Trapeang Chour Community (Kampong Speu)
60 Youth Resource Development Program (YRDP)

PDF format:  Download full statement in Khmer Download full statement in English

Stop Evictions: Boeung Chhouk A community should not be evicted during the Covid-19 Pandemic

Photo by Community

Khan Russey Keo authorities forcibly evicted 20 households of Boeung Chhouk A community, located on Street 598, in Group III, Boeung Chhouk Village, Sangkat Kilometer 6, Khan Russey Keo, Phnom Penh, claiming that the land was to be used for public development. As of 4 August 2021, 11 of the 20 houses were demolished without compensation. The local authorities promised each of the households 500,000 Riel (approximately USD $125) which they have yet to receive.

Khan Russey Keo authorities invited all 20 households for a meeting on 28 August 2020, to discuss the compensation in the form of plots of land to be provided to the affected community members. According to a community representative, Khan Russey Keo authorities promised to provide each affected household a 4m by 15m plot of land located along O Veng Cannal in Khan Russey Keo. At the time, all 20 households accepted the offer, but they have yet to see these promised plots.

A community representative said that “It is difficult now because we did not receive proper compensation. For now, some families are living with their relatives, or renting houses and one family has nowhere to go so they are living here in a tent.”

In relation to the process of relocating this poor community, the Phnom Penh Municipality and all authorities should respect, protect and fulfill the rights of the people to adequate housing and an adequate standard of living. The United Nations “Guidelines on Evictions and Resettlement” should be implemented effectively by ensuring that a solution is reached using a participatory approach that involves the community. In addition, the authorities should resolve these issues in peaceful way by providing adequate and equitable compensation to the remaining families and to continue to support the families who have been relocated by providing public services such as water, electricity, roads, as well as employment opportunities or social protection if they are not able to find work.

 

 

Drop All Charges Against Mother Nature Activists, Release Imprisoned Rights Activists

The Phnom Penh Municipal Court on Sunday charged four members of the Mother Nature environmental movement with plotting an attack against the state and insulting the king, part of the targeted and outrageous persecution of frontline environmental defenders and grassroots activists by the government. Authorities should stop imprisoning and start listening to our youth activists who are on the front line of documenting the risks Cambodia faces from natural resource exploitation and environmental degradation. These activists are tirelessly and selflessly working for the nation’s best interests.

We, the undersigned communities and civil society groups, demand the immediate release of the arrested environmental activists, dropping of all charges, and a halt to the relentless repression and prosecution of the environmental movement.

Sun Ratha, Yim Leanghy and Alejandro Gonzalez-Davidson were charged with plotting and insulting the king (lèse majesté) under articles 453 and 437 (bis) of the Cambodian Criminal Code, which carry maximum prison sentences of 10 years and 5 years, respectively. A fourth activist, Ly Chandaravuth, was charged with plotting.

Three of the activists were sent to pre-trial detention in Phnom Penh’s Correctional Centers 1 and 2 on 21 June, while Gonzalez-Davidson remains outside the country after he was deported in 2015.

Ratha and Chandaravuth were arrested on Phnom Penh’s riverside along with Seth Chhivlimeng, who was later released. The trio were documenting runoff from drainpipes along the river. At the same time, Kandal province’s Koh Thom district authorities summonsed environmental activist Yim Leanghy for questioning and arrested him, later transferring him to Phnom Penh. The whereabouts of the four activists were kept secret for at least 24 hours after their initial arrest, putting undue stress on their families and depriving them access to prompt legal counsel.

The three activists were then brought to the Phnom Penh Municipal Court and questioned by the prosecutor on 19 June and charged on 20 June, with the plotting and insulting the king charges leaked to pro-government media even before they were conveyed to the activists’ lawyers. This type of subterfuge undermines the activists’ right to a fair trial.

Leanghy is a 32-year-old student who obtained a scholarship to study for a Master’s degree at the Royal University of Phnom Penh’s Institute of Foreign Languages. Ratha is a 26-year-old accountant who graduated from the University of Cambodia, where she was also studying on a scholarship. Chandaravuth is a 22-year-old law student in his 4th year of studying law at the Royal University of Law and Economics.

Their arrests are unfounded and the charges are baseless, and are yet another example of the Cambodian government and judiciary using trumped-up charges to imprison young human rights defenders. Advocating for human rights and demanding that the authorities protect the environment are not crimes, and jailing the country’s future generation of environmental defenders imperils us all.

The arrests come less than two months after the conviction of three other Mother Nature activists in May 2021, for baseless charges of incitement. Thun Ratha, Phuon Keoraksmey and Long Kunthea were convicted and sentenced to 18 to 20 months in prison for planning a one-woman march in Phnom Penh to advocate against the filling-in of Boeung Tamok, which has been carved out piecemeal to private interests and state institutions. Gonzalez-Davidson and another activist, Chea Kunthin, were also convicted in absentia.

In 2020, the government arrested at least 16 youth activists for protesting the detention of unionist Rong Chhun, who was arrested and charged with incitement for comments he made about the Cambodia-Vietnam border.

As overcrowded prisons across the country struggle with a COVID-19 outbreak, the government appears intent on arresting anyone who voices dissent or protests peacefully. The courts have shown little inclination to release people convicted for non-violent crimes early or on bail, but instead continue to incarcerate peaceful activists, putting their health at risk.

We demand that the members of the Mother Nature movement, and all environmental and human rights activists currently imprisoned, be released immediately and all charges against them dropped without condition.

Signed by:

  1. 197 Land Community (Koh Kong)
  2. Am Leang Community (Kampong Speu)
  3. Affiliated Network for Social Accountability (ANSA)
  4. Andong Trabek Land Community (Svay Rieng)
  5. Alliance for Conflict Transformation (ACT)
  6. Activities for Environment Community (AEC)
  7. Building Community Voices (BCV)
  8. Cambodian Alliance of Trade Unions (CATU)
  9. Cambodian Labor Confederation (CLC)
  10. Cambodian Food and Service Workers’ Federation (CFSWF)
  11. Cambodian Human Rights and Development Association (ADHOC)
  12. Cambodian Center for Human Rights (CCHR)
  13. Cambodia Development People Life Association (CDPLA)
  14. Cambodia’s Independent Civil Servants Association (CICA)
  15. Cambodian Independent Teachers’ Association (CITA)
  16. Cambodian Informal Economy Workers Association (CIWA-CLC)
  17. Cambodian League for the Promotion and Defense of Human Rights (LICADHO)
  18. Cambodian Tourism Workers Union Federation (CTWUF)
  19. Cambodian Youth Network (CYN)
  20. Center for Alliance of Labor and Human Rights (CENTRAL)
  21. Chak Krey land Community (Banteay Meanchey)
  22. Chi Kha Kraom Land Community (Koh Kong)
  23. Chi Kha Leu Land Community (Koh Kong)
  24. Chray Indigenous Community (Ratanakiri)
  25. Choam Kravien Community (Tboung Khmum)
  26. Coalition for Integrity and Social Accountability (CISA)
  27. Coalition of Cambodian Farmers Community Association (CCFC)
  28. Committee for Free and Fair Elections in Cambodia (COMFREL)
  29. Community Peace-Building Network (CPN)
  30. Community to Protect Nature (Pursat)
  31. Dak Por Community (Kampong Speu)
  32. Equitable Cambodia (EC)
  33. Federation of Free Trade Union of Workers of the Kingdom of Cambodia (FTUWKC)
  34. C.C Employees Union
  35. Independent Democracy of Informal Economy Association (IDEA)
  36. Independent Trade Union Federation (INTUFE)
  37. Indigenous Community in Prame Commune (Preah Vihear)
  38. Khmer Kampuchea Krom For Human Rights and Development Association (KKKHRDA)
  39. Kleang Toek 78 Community (Siemreap)
  40. Koh Sralao Fishery Community (Koh Kong)
  41. Labour Right Supported Union Khmer Employee of Nagaworld (L.R.S.U)
  42. Land Community (Pailin)
  43. Lor Peang Land Community (Kampong Chhnang)
  44. Mean Chey Land Community (Svay Rieng)
  45. M’Lop Tapang
  46. Mother Nature Cambodia (MNC)
  47. Ou Damdaek Community (Kampong Thom)
  48. Ou Vor Preng Community (Battambang)
  49. Peace Bridges Organization (PBO)
  50. Peam Ros Community (Kampong Speu)
  51. People Center for Development and Peace (PDP-Center)
  52. Phum Sela Khmer Land Community (Banteay Meanchey)
  53. Phum Phsar Kandal Land Community (Banteay Meanchey)
  54. Phnom Krom Community (Siemreap)
  55. Ponlok Khmer (PKH)
  56. Prey Peay Fishery Community (Kampot)
  57. Prey Chher Pech Changvar Laor Chhert Community (Kampong Chhnang)
  58. Rattanak Rokha Forestry Community (Oddar Meanchey)
  59. Reaksmei Sameakki Community (Kampong Speu)
  60. Rural Cambodia Technological Support Organisation (RCTSO)
  61. Sahmakum Teang Tnaut (STT)
  62. Samaki Chek Meas Community (Svay Rieng)
  63. Samaki Romeas Haek Community (Svay Rieng)
  64. Siem Reap Airport H.C.C Company Tourism Employees Union
  65. Sofitel Phokeethra Hotel Independent Solidarity Union
  66. Sre Prang Community (Tboung Khmum)
  67. Ta Ni Land Community (Siemreap)
  68. The Cambodian NGO Committee on CEDAW (NGO-CEDAW)
  69. Trapeang Chour Community (Kampong Speu)
  70. Transparency International Cambodia (TI)
  71. Tourism Employees Union of Les Jardin Du Bassac
  72. Tourism Employees Union of Cintri (Cambodia)
  73. Tourism Employees Union of GSI
  74. Youth Resources Development Program (YRDP)
  75. Building and Wood Workers Trade Union Federation of Cambodia (BWTUC)

PDF format:  Download full statement in Khmer Download full statement in English